RUMPELSTILTSKIN

- By The Brothers Grimm
Font Size
This page in a nutshell: We are publishing selections of Wikipedia articles for offline use in Kiwix releases, in print, or for distribution on flash drives/memory cards.ShortcutsWP:1.0WP:1 Wikipedia 1.0 — (talk)FAQ — To do Release version toolsGuide — (talk) — (stats) Article selection process(talk)Version 0.8 bot selection Version 0.8 feedback IRC channel (IRC) Release criteria Review team (FAQ) Version 0.8 release (manual selection) (t) "Selection" project (Talk) schools selectionOffline WP for Indian Schools CORE TOPICSCORE SUPPLEMENTCore topics - 1,000(Talk) (COTF) (bot) TORRENT (Talk) "Selection" project for kids ((t)) WORK VIA WIKIPROJECTS (talk) Pushing to 1.0 (talk) Static content subcom. This is the Version 1.0 Editorial Team page. General background[edit] Article ratings assessment scheme In late 2003, Jimmy Wales had proposed making an offline release version of Wikipedia. This group was formed in late 2004 to meet this challenge. Our work involves identifying and organizing articles, and improving and maintaining a core set. Our work does not hinder the existing wiki process for creating and editing articles, but rather it supports that work by providing additional organization. We aim to produce collections that can be used in places where the internet coverage is expensive or non-existent. Our early collections were distributed via DVD; now these are shared via download, then distributed on hardware such as a Raspberry Pi. Originally, only a fixed selection was available, but there is now much flexibility in how selections can be made. This project is now mainly one point in a network of groups who collect and distribute open educational resources from the Internet in an offline form. See these more detailed related articles: Guide to Wikipedia Release Version tools Wikipedia 1.0 FAQs Wikipedia 1.0 Release Version Criteria Broad overview of Wikimedia's Offline Project How you can help[edit] Main page: Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/To do You are encouraged to join us and help out with one of the projects, or to discuss Wikipedia 1.0 on the talk page. A significant part of our work centers around maintaining the assessment scheme, which is now used on more than seven million articles by over 1000 active WikiProjects on the English Wikipedia. It is also being used on other language projects. Generally work on this team is sporadic – periods of hectic activity followed by long periods of waiting! Often work is long and tedious – checking through a list of 22,000 instances of profanities one by one, organizing 10,000 keywords taken from category names, or dealing with technical bugs when the assessment bot fails for no apparent reason. However, it is all worth it in the end. Our strategy has been intensely debated, but the group has reached a consensus. We elected not to follow the German model. Instead we chose to start with a core of quality articles on key subjects and expand from there. We have produced three test versions: Version 0.5, Version 0.7, and Version 0.8 with the goal of releasing better collections of articles in due course. The next general release is generically referred to as "Release Version" while our first "official" comprehensive release will be called Version 1.0. These collections are then made available for offline use using a reader such as Kiwix, which was chosen as Sourceforge project of the month. The project was on hiatus for several years because of the loss of our main developer. However, as of February 2016, a new group of developers has begun work on upgrading the code and the process, in order to start producing new collections again, especially collections for schools. Current needs[edit] Although we have much of the requisite system automated, there are still some outstanding tasks: Preparation of a reliable index. If you can write code and you're interested in how to map category trees into a useful index (not as easy as it sounds!) please contact Walkerma. Reviewing manual nominations. Whenever there is a new release being planned, we need volunteers to review a few articles and process them. Propose useful "guide" pages to be added, such as lists and disambiguation pages. Check for vandalism in the selected version-IDs of the articles. Develop nice pages for navigation through the content, such as subject portals. Test the reader software, and find and report bugs. Help with distribution, especially in remote areas without Internet access. Please let us know on the Talk page if you can help with any of these. A page read offline in Kiwix Status[edit] At present, the main activities are: The assessment scheme, which is used by WikiProjects for organizing their content, using talk page tags and the WP1.0 bot. The bot was updated with completely new Perl code in 2020–2021, and it is currently maintained by User:Audiodude. Technical problems with the bot should be reported here. Related to this work is the WP1.0 server (previously called "Release Version Tools) which provides ways for WikiProjects to analyze article lists and data relating to their work. Collaborations to produce offline collections are done in collaboration with various people from Kiwix and Internet-in-a-Box. Please contact Walkerma if you wish to help. To select articles, we are mainly using a bot-assisted selection process based on assessment by individual WikiProjects, where articles are selected automatically based on quality and importance project rankings. RevID selection[edit] Based on discussions (at the 2017 Potsdam hackathon and since), we plan to reactivate RevID selection. Previously code based on WikiTrust was used in Version 0.8, and this appeared to produce a largely vandalism-free collection of articles. This worked by scoring each RevID based on the edits remaining in it, and choosing the most "trustworthy" recent RevID based on the WikiTrust algorithm. Wikipedia 1.0 projects[edit] Active projects[edit] If you would like to start a new project, please discuss it on the talk page first before adding it here. Wikipedia 1.0 Projects Name Summary of overall strategy Coordinator Description of activities School selection Put together selections of 1–10 GB sizes for use in high schools and elementary schools User:Walkerma and others Uses new code that starts with a seed and works out, guided by the WP 1 selection ranking to guide it Work via WikiProjects (WVWP) Use "networking" to mobilise our existing subject specialists User:Walkerma Organise and facilitate compilation of article lists from the WikiProjects and seek to identify important topics within each WikiProject's area of expertise. Locate important topics that are currently not being managed by projects. In conjunction with WP:COUNCIL, the project serves as a link with the editing community, and may later help locate expert reviewers. Past releases[edit] Past Wikipedia 1.0 Projects Name Summary of overall strategy Month of release Description of activities Website Next release Version 0.5 A test release prior to release of Version 1.0 above. April 2007 A test release designed to pave the way for Version 1.0. Used manual nominations and approval based on importance and quality. Approval was by only one person, from the review team. Okawix Version 0.7 Version 0.7 A test release of automated article selections, prior to release of Version 1.0 above. Early 2010 A test release designed to pave the way for Version 1.0. Used SelectionBot to make an article selection based on importance and quality. Vandalism prevention used a script, with manual checks, which delayed the release significantly. [1] Kiwix reader, ZIM download Version 0.8 Version 0.8 A test release of automated article selections, prior to release of Version 1.0 above. March 2011 A test release designed to pave the way for Version 1.0. Version 0.8 used bot-assisted article selection, with manual adjustments based on feedback from WikiProjects. Used as a test of the WikiTrust revisionID selection code - this worked well. Wikipedia:Version 0.8/downloads. Version 0.9 2006 Wikipedia CD Selection (previously called "Test Version") Work with release version done off site that was coordinated by BozMo April 2006 2000 articles with content filtered/selected for use by children (see Wikipedia:Wikipedia CD Selection). No longer available - see 2008/9 release below 2007 Wikipedia CD Selection (below) 2007 Wikipedia CD Selection Work with release version done off site that was coordinated by BozMo May 2007 4655 articles with content filtered/selected for use by children (see Wikipedia:Wikipedia CD Selection). No longer available - see 2008/9 release below 2008/9 Wikipedia CD Selection (below) 2008/9 Wikipedia CD Selection Work with release version done off site that was coordinated by BozMo October 2008 5502 articles with content filtered/selected for use by children (see Wikipedia:Wikipedia CD Selection). http://schools-wikipedia.org Not yet known Inactive projects[edit] Inactive Wikipedia 1.0 Projects Name Summary of overall strategy Coordinator Description of activities Authoritative Editions Gives experts in each field the tools to review suitable articles in their area of expertise and give their okay to particular revisions. Sj, Jeff Keller, Gnp Allow editors to propose new groups; for example: "Featured Article review" or "American Physical Society peer review". Each blessing group would have a set of review guidelines. Each blessing group would consist of this set of guidelines, and a set of users who could bless a revision of an article as satisfying them. Articles with blessed revisions would display icons or links to last-blessed revisions. Featured Articles First reviewing older or problem FAs to ensure that quality is maintained, ready for inclusion of these articles in Wikipedia 1.0. (Now a standard part of the FA system) Geography project to produce a descriptive gazetteer of the world for publication. This could include an atlas, continents, countries and major cities. This would serve as a test bed for publishing Wikipedia 1.0, but could also be a valuable stand-alone product. Three Level Editing Users participate in a three part editing process to assure that pages are up to quality standards. The first level is just a general check, the second level is a factual check, and the third level is a last "just in case" check. This process would assure that articles would be up to standards without putting too much responsibility on one user. Biographies Improve and assess biographical articles Focus especially on the 200 Core Biographies, in conjunction with Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography. . Dynamic Pocket Cyclopedia Lists most important FAs, FLs, and GAs. An evolving list of no more than half of Wikipedia's most important featured articles, featured lists, and designated good articles. WikiSort Integrate the sifting process into the Wiki. Aims to use data from the planned user rating scheme to provide rankings of articles, such that important quality articles can be automatically identified for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. This project has been rendered obsolete by WikiProject-based assessments (see above). Article assessment To assess articles This project has been rendered obsolete by WikiProject-based assessments (see above). Publishing steps[edit] The process of generating an offline version of a sub-selection of Wikipedia article is multistage. It needs many dedicated and singled-purposed operations. The following chart show how the WP1 project envisioned things in 2010. The general process for producing an offline release Even if this chart is still, to a large extend, valid; we practice and envision things slightly differently nowadays. One of the most important paradigm change we had to make is to remove as much as possible human based manual activity because the amount of work is simply too high to be achieved in a reasonable amount of time. We tend now to automatize as much as possible the whole process. As a consequence the project is now predominantly focused on technology. Technical approach[edit] Support Wikiproject assessment effort[edit] The first software created to support the WP1 project has been the User:WP_1.0_bot. First written in Perl by User:CBM and then slighly modified and maintained by a few other volunteers. In 2020 the bot has been totally rewritten in Python following modern development standards (API, automated tests, etc.) by User:Audiodude. The code base is available en developed on Github. The WP1bot had and still have three traditional purposes: gather assessments (via categories introduced on main namespace articles talk pages), upload on Wikipedia logs & stats provide key information & tools to Wikiproject on a dedicated Web service. The data can also be accessed through an API at api.wp1.openzim.org Select article titles[edit] ... Select article revision[edit] ... Scrape selected articles for offline usage[edit] ... Orchestrate periodic and multiple scraping[edit] ... Publish and distribute offline snapshots[edit] ... Statistics[edit] The WP 1.0 bot tracks assessment data (article quality and importance data for individual WikiProjects) assigned via Talk page banners. If you would like to add a new WikiProject to the bot's list, please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot. The global summary table below is computed by taking the highest quality and importance rating for each assessed article in the main namespace. All rated articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low ??? Total FA 1,556 2,448 2,375 1,892 180 8,451 FL 179 665 761 695 109 2,409 A 355 681 783 579 83 2,481 GA 3,164 7,188 14,513 18,991 1,730 45,586 B 16,565 32,148 53,055 65,471 20,289 187,528 C 16,546 53,059 132,236 296,146 84,158 582,145 Start 18,477 91,830 411,529 1,574,412 396,022 2,492,270 Stub 4,226 31,619 278,228 2,772,589 760,458 3,847,120 List 4,755 16,855 53,031 187,805 66,696 329,142 Assessed 65,823 236,493 946,511 4,918,580 1,329,725 7,497,132 Unassessed 120 482 1,248 19,223 424,618 445,691 Total 65,943 236,975 947,759 4,937,803 1,754,343 7,942,823 About this table Related pages[edit] General[edit] Jimbo's proposal, Chicago Meetup - Jimbo's Oct 2004 ideas on how to get to 1.0. Wikipedia:Pushing to 1.0 Early discussion page for brainstorming ideas, before this team was created. meta:Wikipedia 1.0 meta:Static content group Assessment and validation[edit] Wikipedia:Article assessment meta:Article validation and Wikipedia:Pushing to validation - argue the benefit of article validation and possible implementations Wikipedia:Flagged revisions (similar to the older "stable versions") Wikipedia:Flagged revisions/Sighted versions Wikipedia:Flagged revisions/Quality versions Wikipedia:Flagged revisions/reliable revisions Wikipedia:Flagged revisions/Checkpoints and grading Demo version of flagged revisions Wikipedia:Footnotes Wikipedia:Peer review Wikipedia:Request for comment Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check Wikipedia books[edit] Wikipedia:Books & meta:WikiReader - Wikipedia books are collections of articles from Wikipedia on a certain topic, in the form of PDFs published for download and intended to be printed, and also to be sold in printed form. The Book Tool, and Wiki to print, a collaboration between the Foundation and OSI/PediaPress. Article selections[edit] Wikipedia:Vital articles Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles - Filling the gaps. Wikipedia:Good articles Featured Articles Wikipedia:Featured article candidates Wikipedia:Featured articles Wikipedia:What is a featured article Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates Wikipedia:Stable versions See also[edit] List of online encyclopedias - compare Wikipedia with other projects vteWikipedia communityFor a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal.For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.General communitytopics Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots Contents and grading Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creation Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors WikiProjectsand collaborations Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility Organizations category Awards and feedback Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks! Maintenance tasks Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues Administratorsand noticeboards Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement Content disputeresolution Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources Other noticeboardsand assistance Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse Deletiondiscussions Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue Elections and votings Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones Directories, indexes,and summaries Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup Media Category Templates

RUMPELSTILTSKIN

"A. L. Bowley – Rumpelstiltskin" by Sofi is licensed under CC by 2.0.

1 By the side of a wood, in a country a long way off, ran a fine stream of water; and upon the stream there stood a mill. The miller's house was close by, and the miller, you must know, had a very beautiful daughter. She was, moreover, very shrewd and clever; and the miller was so proud of her, that he one day told the king of the land, who used to come and hunt in the wood, that his daughter could spin gold out of straw. Now this king was very fond of money; and when he heard the miller's boast his greediness was raised, and he sent for the girl to be brought before him. Then he led her to a chamber in his palace where there was a great heap of straw, and gave her a spinning-wheel, and said, "All this must be spun into gold before morning, as you love your life." It was in vain that the poor maiden said that it was only a silly boast of her father, for that she could do no such thing as spin straw into gold: the chamber door was locked, and she was left alone.

2 She sat down in one corner of the room, and began to bewail her hard fate; when on a sudden the door opened, and a droll-looking little man hobbled in, and said, "Good morrow to you, my good lass; what are you weeping for?" "Alas!" said she, "I must spin this straw into gold, and I know not how." "What will you give me," said the hobgoblin, "to do it for you?" "My necklace," replied the maiden. He took her at her word, and sat himself down to the wheel, and whistled and sang:

"Round about, round about,
Lo and behold!
Reel away, reel away,
Straw into gold!"

and round about the wheel went merrily; the work was quickly done, and the straw was all spun into gold.

3 When the king came and saw this, he was greatly astonished and pleased; but his heart grew still more greedy of gain, and he shut up the poor miller's daughter again with a fresh task. Then she knew not what to do, and sat down once more to weep; but the dwarf soon opened the door, and said, "What will you give me to do your task?" "The ring on my finger," said she. So her little friend took the ring, and began to work at the wheel again, and whistled and sang:

"Round about, round about,
Lo and behold!
Reel away, reel away,
Straw into gold!"

till, long before morning, all was done again.

4 The king was greatly delighted to see all this glittering treasure; but still he had not enough: so he took the miller's daughter to a yet larger heap, and said, "All this must be spun tonight; and if it is, you shall be my queen." As soon as she was alone that dwarf came in, and said, "What will you give me to spin gold for you this third time?" "I have nothing left," said she. "Then say you will give me," said the little man, "the first little child that you may have when you are queen." "That may never be," thought the miller's daughter: and as she knew no other way to get her task done, she said she would do what he asked. Round went the wheel again to the old song, and the manikin once more spun the heap into gold. The king came in the morning, and, finding all he wanted, was forced to keep his word; so he married the miller's daughter, and she really became queen.

5 At the birth of her first little child she was very glad, and forgot the dwarf, and what she had said. But one day he came into her room, where she was sitting playing with her baby, and put her in mind of it. Then she grieved sorely at her misfortune, and said she would give him all the wealth of the kingdom if he would let her off, but in vain; till at last her tears softened him, and he said, "I will give you three days' grace, and if during that time you tell me my name, you shall keep your child."

6 Now the queen lay awake all night, thinking of all the odd names that she had ever heard; and she sent messengers all over the land to find out new ones. The next day the little man came, and she began with TIMOTHY, ICHABOD, BENJAMIN, JEREMIAH, and all the names she could remember; but to all and each of them he said, "Madam, that is not my name."

7 The second day she began with all the comical names she could hear of, BANDY-LEGS, HUNCHBACK, CROOK-SHANKS, and so on; but the little gentleman still said to every one of them, "Madam, that is not my name."

8 The third day one of the messengers came back, and said, "I have traveled two days without hearing of any other names; but yesterday, as I was climbing a high hill, among the trees of the forest where the fox and the hare bid each other good night, I saw a little hut; and before the hut burnt a fire; and round about the fire a funny little dwarf was dancing upon one leg, and singing:

'Merrily the feast I'll make.
Today I'll brew, tomorrow bake;
Merrily I'll dance and sing,
For next day will a stranger bring.
Little does my lady dream
Rumpelstiltskin is my name!

9 'When the queen heard this she jumped for joy, and as soon as her little friend came she sat down upon her throne, and called all her court round to enjoy the fun; and the nurse stood by her side with the baby in her arms, as if it was quite ready to be given up. Then the little man began to chuckle at the thought of having the poor child, to take home with him to his hut in the woods; and he cried out, "Now, lady, what is my name?" "Is it JOHN?" asked she. "No, madam!" "Is it TOM?" "No, madam!" "Is it JEMMY?" "It is not." "Can your name be RUMPELSTILTSKIN?" said the lady slyly. "Some witch told you that! - some witch told you that!" cried the little man, and dashed his right foot in a rage so deep into the floor, that he was forced to lay hold of it with both hands to pull it out.

10 Then he made the best of his way off, while the nurse laughed and the baby crowed; and all the court jeered at him for having had so much trouble for nothing, and said, "We wish you a very good morning, and a merry feast, Mr. RUMPELSTILTSKIN!

Current Page: 1

GRADE:5

Word Lists:

Mill : a building equipped with machinery for grinding grain into flour.

Reel : a cylinder on which film, wire, thread, or other flexible materials can be wound

Bewail : express great regret, disappointment, or bitterness over (something)

Greedy : having or showing an intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth or power

Hobble : walk in an awkward way, typically because of pain from an injury

Comical : amusing

Merry : cheerful and lively

Hut : a small, simple, single-story house or shelter

Lass : a girl or young woman

Sly : having or showing a cunning and deceitful nature

More...

Additional Information:

Rating: C Words in the Passage: 1152 Unique Words: 359 Sentences: 50
Noun: 322 Conjunction: 124 Adverb: 85 Interjection: 4
Adjective: 56 Pronoun: 145 Verb: 216 Preposition: 113
Letter Count: 4,382 Sentiment: Positive Tone: Conversational Difficult Words: 127
EdSearch WebSearch
Questions and Answers

Please wait while we generate questions and answers...

Ratings & Comments

Write a Review
5 Star
0
0
4 Star
0
0
3 Star
0
0
2 Star
0
0
1 Star
0
0
0

0 Ratings & 0 Reviews

Report an Error