10 - The Remainder Theorem of Synthetic Division & Polynomial Long Division - Part 1 - By Math and Science
Transcript
00:00 | Hello . Welcome back to algebra . We're going to | |
00:02 | conquer the topic called the remainder theorem of polynomial in | |
00:06 | algebra . This is part one of two . So | |
00:08 | we're covering what we call the remainder theorem . Now | |
00:11 | keep in mind that we're going to understand and learn | |
00:13 | this theorem in this lesson . But in the next | |
00:15 | couple of lessons will conquer something called the factor theorem | |
00:18 | . The remainder theorem and the factor theorem kind of | |
00:20 | go together like peanut butter and jelly . They they | |
00:23 | very much are cousins of one another . But I | |
00:25 | don't want to put them in the same lesson because | |
00:27 | it will make it too long and too cumbersome . | |
00:28 | So just keep in mind that you are going to | |
00:31 | understand the remainder theorem in this lesson . But when | |
00:33 | we get to the factor theorem , I'll be referencing | |
00:35 | this theorem and it'll come together and even make more | |
00:38 | sense once we can put both of them together . | |
00:41 | Now this theorem frequently gives students problems . It doesn't | |
00:44 | make a lot of sense the first time you read | |
00:45 | it . So what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna | |
00:47 | cut to the chase . I'm gonna write the theorem | |
00:49 | down . You won't understand how it's true or why | |
00:52 | it's true , but I'll explain what it does . | |
00:54 | Then we'll do a quick example to show you how | |
00:56 | to use it . That's what I really want you | |
00:58 | to be able to do . It's very , very | |
00:59 | simple to use the remainder theory of polynomial . And | |
01:03 | then what I'll do is I'll I'm not gonna prove | |
01:05 | the theorem , but I'm gonna show you why it | |
01:07 | works . I want you to know why it works | |
01:09 | . And then we'll wrap up the lesson with another | |
01:11 | example . So we're gonna get a couple of examples | |
01:13 | here , we're gonna get some a little bit of | |
01:14 | theory , a little bit of background about why it | |
01:16 | works . And then in the next lesson , will | |
01:19 | crank up the complexity a little bit more . So | |
01:21 | here we're talking about the remainder theorem . So you | |
01:24 | might think it has something to do with the remainders | |
01:26 | and you'll be right . So the remainder zero , | |
01:31 | that's what the th means remained your theory . Alright | |
01:34 | , so here's my best guess at my best way | |
01:36 | of writing it down in a way that's going to | |
01:38 | be to the point if the polynomial , that's what | |
01:43 | Polly means . P vex So I'm just naming any | |
01:46 | polynomial P of X . Can be any polynomial you | |
01:48 | want any degree , right ? Is if that polynomial | |
01:51 | is divided , buy some quantity X minus C . | |
01:58 | Now this could be X minus one , X minus | |
02:00 | three . X minus four . Also it could be | |
02:02 | because C could be positive or negative , it could | |
02:04 | be X plus five X plus 10 . You know | |
02:06 | , just like we were doing for synthetic division , | |
02:08 | if it's divided by anything like this , then the | |
02:12 | following thing is true , then the remainder . That's | |
02:17 | why it's called the remainder theorem . When you do | |
02:21 | that division , the remainder left over . When you | |
02:22 | do that division is the value P evaluated at seat | |
02:30 | . Now I'm gonna let that sink in for a | |
02:31 | little bit because it doesn't make a lot of sense | |
02:34 | . We normally think about remainders as being something to | |
02:37 | do with division because that's that's what it is , | |
02:39 | right ? But now I'm telling you that this remainder | |
02:41 | is kind of connected to the value PFC . What | |
02:44 | am I trying to say here ? I'm trying to | |
02:46 | say that we know how to evaluate polynomial . When | |
02:49 | I say PFC , that means I'm putting some number | |
02:51 | into the polynomial . I'm calculating what it can do | |
02:54 | . So let's say I want to calculate this value | |
02:56 | of this polynomial when X is equal to two . | |
02:59 | Of course I can do it manually . I can | |
03:01 | just stick it in in the value and calculate the | |
03:03 | polynomial right ? But what I'm also saying is there's | |
03:05 | another way to find the value of that polynomial evaluated | |
03:09 | at that number . And that way to do it | |
03:12 | is to divide the polynomial by by that same number | |
03:15 | basically X minus that number and then crank through it | |
03:18 | all and figure out what the remainder is at the | |
03:20 | end . The remainder is gonna be the value P | |
03:22 | evaluated at sea . So for an example , I | |
03:26 | always like to give examples that make everything easier . | |
03:28 | Let's say we have some polynomial can be any polynomial | |
03:32 | you want But I'm gonna pick one here . Two | |
03:34 | X cubed minus seven X squared plus five x minus | |
03:38 | one . So here's a polynomial . You all know | |
03:41 | that I can put numbers into this polynomial and I | |
03:43 | can calculate the answers . That's what we have been | |
03:45 | doing forever . So I can put the number one | |
03:47 | in here and I can calculate the value . I | |
03:49 | can put the number 17 in here and calculate the | |
03:51 | value . But you also have to agree that because | |
03:53 | it's cube terms and X and X square terms and | |
03:56 | so on that , it might be a little cumbersome | |
03:59 | to evaluate that polynomial by sticking the number in there | |
04:02 | . Because let's say I put the number 11 and | |
04:04 | I'll have to take 11 cube then multiplied by two | |
04:07 | , then 11 square , then multiply by negative seven | |
04:10 | , then 11 times five and all this . And | |
04:12 | I have to add all the terms together . So | |
04:13 | there's a lot of multiplication is going on because of | |
04:16 | the exponents . And then I have to add everything | |
04:18 | together . So if I want to evaluate the value | |
04:20 | of this polynomial and a number I can do it | |
04:22 | . Of course I can . But I have to | |
04:24 | crank through all of those exponents and and do it | |
04:27 | . What this remainder theory is telling you telling you | |
04:30 | that if you want to find , I can find | |
04:36 | any value I want . But let's just pick one | |
04:38 | p evaluated at three . So if I wanted to | |
04:40 | do that I would stick three in here in Cuba | |
04:42 | and three in here and square it three and so | |
04:44 | on and multiply and add everything . But another way | |
04:47 | to find it , then The value p . of | |
04:52 | three that I'm seeking to find is the remainder left | |
04:59 | over . When we divide This polynomial . That in | |
05:07 | question divided by X -3 . I need to let | |
05:11 | you sink this have the sink in because really the | |
05:15 | black text is kind of like what you might see | |
05:17 | in a book . But really everything below the black | |
05:20 | text is really what I want you to think about | |
05:21 | because it's much easier say you have some polynomial , | |
05:24 | you want to figure out what the value of it | |
05:25 | is that X is equal to three . Of course | |
05:27 | I can put the number three in there and calculated | |
05:29 | . But there is an alternative way to find out | |
05:31 | what the value is here . And that alternative way | |
05:34 | is to take this polynomial and divide it by X | |
05:37 | minus whatever I'm evaluating and at But I don't care | |
05:41 | about the value of the division . I only care | |
05:43 | about the remainder . Just that single number at the | |
05:46 | very very end . That number is the one I | |
05:48 | circle and that's gonna be the value P . Evaluated | |
05:50 | at sea . I'm p evaluated at the # three | |
05:54 | . So , let's give a concrete example . I | |
05:56 | want to take this polynomial here . I want to | |
05:58 | divide I want to figure out what P evaluated at | |
06:01 | three is All right ? So , I'm telling you | |
06:04 | that I take this polynomial which is too negative 75 | |
06:08 | negative one . I'm gonna do synthetic division here . | |
06:10 | Right ? I'm telling you I have to divide it | |
06:12 | . Of course I could do the long division . | |
06:13 | There's no problem with that . But we already know | |
06:15 | that synthetic division is much much easier to do when | |
06:19 | we're dividing by X minus the number or X plus | |
06:21 | the number . Remember I told you that there would | |
06:23 | be other uses for synthetic division and here's here's one | |
06:26 | of them . So , we're dividing by something that | |
06:29 | allows us to use synthetic division . We're just gonna | |
06:31 | do synthetic division because it's easier to do . So | |
06:35 | , I'm gonna do this here . And I need | |
06:36 | to divide by x minus three . We know when | |
06:38 | we do synthetic division , that I have to put | |
06:40 | the opposite sign here . The negative three becomes a | |
06:43 | positive three . We're gonna do this division . So | |
06:45 | I draw my horizontal line . I dragged my two | |
06:48 | down three times two is six , add these together | |
06:51 | , get negative 13 times negative ones , negative three | |
06:54 | , add these together . Get a 23 times two | |
06:56 | is six and add these together and you get a | |
06:59 | five . I don't care about any of these numbers | |
07:02 | or any of these numbers or any of these numbers | |
07:04 | or any of these numbers . The only thing I | |
07:06 | care about for the factor for the remainder theorem is | |
07:09 | this number , the remainder was equal to five . | |
07:12 | And what that means is that the polynomial evaluated at | |
07:16 | the number three is actually equal to five . It's | |
07:19 | crazy , right ? It doesn't seem like that would | |
07:20 | be true , but it is true . Let's go | |
07:22 | verify this . The polynomial is given us two x | |
07:26 | cubed minus seven X squared plus five x minus one | |
07:29 | . So let's evaluate P evaluated at three . So | |
07:33 | it's two X cubed . So we'll say 23 cubed | |
07:37 | minus seven X squared 73 squared plus five X , | |
07:43 | Which is five times 3 and then -1 . All | |
07:47 | right . So what we have here is two times | |
07:50 | three cube is 27 . Uh And then three squared | |
07:54 | is 99 times seven is going to be 63 . | |
07:57 | And then we have five jumps , three is 15 | |
08:00 | -1 . And if you go crank through this two | |
08:02 | times 27 , you subtract the 63 and add these | |
08:04 | numbers and so on . You're going to get five | |
08:08 | , which is exactly what we predicted . So why | |
08:10 | do we care about the factor theorem or the remainder | |
08:13 | ? I keep saying factor theorem because we're gonna be | |
08:15 | learning about the factor theorem . It's very closely related | |
08:17 | to this . The reason we care is because when | |
08:20 | we're evaluating polynomial nowadays with computers , it doesn't matter | |
08:23 | because a computer , you know , you can you | |
08:25 | can calculate anything you want , but if you were | |
08:28 | doing this by hand then you would have to calculate | |
08:31 | three times three times three and then three times three | |
08:34 | here and then three times five here . And you | |
08:36 | have to multiply and add everything now . That's just | |
08:38 | for the number three . What if I were calculating | |
08:40 | the polynomial evaluated at the number 127 ? Right then | |
08:45 | I would have to cube 127 and I have to | |
08:47 | square 127 and multiply 127 times five . And multiplying | |
08:51 | ad to get the value of what it is . | |
08:53 | It's going to actually be easier to do the synthetic | |
08:55 | division here because I don't have any cubes anywhere notice | |
08:58 | I haven't cube anything . I just dropped . Multiply | |
09:01 | drop , multiply drop , multiply drop all I care | |
09:03 | about the last number . So the remainder theorem is | |
09:07 | very often used , especially when you're doing things by | |
09:09 | hand . But there's also another use for it because | |
09:11 | we're going to tie it into what we call the | |
09:13 | factor theorem Later on . For right now , I | |
09:15 | only want you to know when you want to find | |
09:17 | the value of a polynomial at a number just divide | |
09:20 | by X minus that number and then the remainder that | |
09:23 | you get is going to be the value that you | |
09:25 | seek . That's really all I'm trying to say . | |
09:26 | And so that's what the black text is saying . | |
09:28 | If the polynomial P of X is divided by this | |
09:31 | number , then the remainder . When you do that | |
09:33 | is the value of P evaluated at that number . | |
09:36 | Okay . Now we want to turn our attention to | |
09:38 | why does it work ? I'm not going to do | |
09:40 | a rigorous proof of it . So we're gonna say | |
09:43 | why does the remainder theorem work ? Why does it | |
09:52 | work ? I think uh even though we're not gonna | |
09:54 | do a rigorous mathematical proof of it , we're not | |
09:56 | gonna do a 10 page proof of why the remainder | |
09:58 | theorem works . I think it's instructive for us to | |
10:01 | decompose a little bit more . What what's really happening | |
10:04 | here ? So notice that it all hinges back to | |
10:07 | this division process . Were saying that when we take | |
10:08 | the polynomial we divide by this , something magical happens | |
10:11 | where the remainder becomes important , basically . So let's | |
10:15 | kind of explore that a little bit . If we | |
10:17 | take this polynomial whatever it is , I'm gonna generalize | |
10:20 | it here , right ? And we divide by something | |
10:23 | on the outside . It goes out here , right | |
10:26 | ? And the answer that you get , we call | |
10:28 | it Q . Of X . Why ? Because we | |
10:31 | have names for all of these things . This thing | |
10:33 | is called the quotient . Okay . This thing on | |
10:38 | the inside is called the dividend . Normally I don't | |
10:42 | care about labelling things , but it's gonna help us | |
10:45 | here in a second . This thing on the outside | |
10:47 | this whole term is called the divisor . That's what | |
10:50 | I'm dividing by now . When I go through this | |
10:52 | process , you know , I'm gonna multiply going to | |
10:55 | subtract and all this stuff . I'm gonna go blah | |
10:57 | blah blah all the way to the end . Eventually | |
10:59 | I'm gonna get some remainder . And this is called | |
11:02 | the remainder . We've done long division enough to know | |
11:06 | that you're going to get some kind of remainder at | |
11:08 | the end . Right ? So let's go ahead and | |
11:10 | go through this process . I've already done it with | |
11:13 | synthetic division . We know the process ends with the | |
11:15 | remainder of five . But let's just go through it | |
11:18 | because it won't take long . And it's going to | |
11:20 | help me explain to you why this remainder theorem actually | |
11:23 | works . So for this polynomial we had two X | |
11:26 | cubed minus seven X squared plus five X minus one | |
11:32 | . And we were dividing it by x minus three | |
11:36 | . Remember we said well we take the polynomial divide | |
11:38 | by X -3 . That's gonna give us the value | |
11:40 | . The remainder will be the value P evaluated at | |
11:42 | three . So let's go ahead and do this real | |
11:44 | quick , verify what the remainder is and then we | |
11:46 | can crank through it . So X . Times what | |
11:49 | gives me two X cubed . It's got to be | |
11:50 | a two X squared there multiply down there . I'm | |
11:53 | gonna get a two X cubed . Multiply down here | |
11:56 | will be negative six X squared . Going a little | |
11:58 | fast because we've done division many many times before . | |
12:01 | We subtract both of these we get zero here seven | |
12:04 | minus and negative 67 I'm sorry negative seven basically plus | |
12:07 | six negative seven minus and minus six is negative seven | |
12:10 | plus six . And that's gonna be negative one X | |
12:13 | squared . So negative one X square . Then I | |
12:16 | take and drag my next thing down like this X | |
12:19 | . Times what gives me negative X . Squared . | |
12:21 | It's gonna be negative X . Multiply here gives me | |
12:24 | negative X squared negative X . Times . This gives | |
12:26 | me positive three X . And I need to subtract | |
12:30 | these two . These subtract to give me 05 minus | |
12:33 | three gives me two X . Then I have to | |
12:36 | drag my next guy down which is -1 X . | |
12:40 | Times something gives me two X . It has to | |
12:42 | be a to multiply . It's gonna give me a | |
12:44 | two X . Two times the negative three gives me | |
12:46 | negative six . I have to subtract them negative one | |
12:50 | minus a negative six means negative one plus six . | |
12:53 | Which gives me a five . And that's exactly what | |
12:55 | we said . The remainder had to be equal to | |
12:56 | five . I just wanted to do it again so | |
12:58 | you can see I'm not doing any funny business with | |
13:00 | the synthetic division . I'm taking the polynomial . I'm | |
13:02 | dividing by X minus three the remainder . I'm getting | |
13:05 | us five . And we've already shown you that when | |
13:07 | you plug the value of three and you get a | |
13:09 | five . Now what we want to do is explore | |
13:11 | a little bit more closely why it falls out that | |
13:14 | way . And does it work for all numbers ? | |
13:15 | Right . All right . So what we want to | |
13:18 | do ? Because we want to talk about if we | |
13:21 | do this division here , right ? Or in general | |
13:24 | , any kind of division here , how do we | |
13:26 | check the answer ? Right ? If we wanted to | |
13:28 | check the answer here , we've done that many times | |
13:30 | before . When I taught you division , I'll taught | |
13:32 | you how to check it . I said , well | |
13:34 | , what you do is you take what you get | |
13:36 | at the top , you multiply while it's out here | |
13:38 | , and then whatever you get there as a result | |
13:41 | , you add the remainder and then what you should | |
13:43 | get back is what's underneath . So , another way | |
13:46 | of saying is , is that is you take the | |
13:47 | divisor , You multiply it by the quotient , which | |
13:50 | is what the answer that you got was . Uh | |
13:53 | and you're gonna get something but you have to add | |
13:55 | the remainder back into it to get what's underneath . | |
13:57 | This is exactly the same thing as dividing , you | |
14:00 | know , uh dividing um 19 by three or something | |
14:05 | like this . And you're gonna get a five here | |
14:07 | , that's 15 . You're gonna subtract and you're gonna | |
14:10 | get a four , you're gonna get a remainder of | |
14:11 | four , right ? So what we're basically saying is | |
14:14 | that in order to check this division , you take | |
14:16 | what's in front the three , You multiply it by | |
14:19 | the five and you have to add the remainder back | |
14:21 | in . So you're gonna get 15 plus four . | |
14:24 | And if you get 19 if you get what's underneath | |
14:26 | here , then the division was correct . So we're | |
14:28 | doing the same thing here , we take the divisor | |
14:30 | . We multiply by the quotient . We add the | |
14:32 | remainder and what we get should be equal to what's | |
14:35 | under here the dividend . So if you're going to | |
14:38 | generalize that , the way you say it is , | |
14:41 | you say the polynomial P of x is going to | |
14:47 | be equal to the Q of X . That you | |
14:49 | get for the answer that close in their times the | |
14:53 | divisor x minus C plus the remainder . All I've | |
14:56 | said is this polynomial here is going to be equal | |
14:59 | to the divisor times the quotient , plus the remainder | |
15:02 | were just checking our work and it has to equal | |
15:04 | what's under here . So for this case it's this | |
15:06 | times this plus the remainder has got to equal this | |
15:09 | . All right . So let's generate let's kind of | |
15:11 | change it a little bit into the problem that we | |
15:14 | actually have . So what we're basically saying is this | |
15:17 | polynomial P of X , which we know what it | |
15:20 | is . Is given in our problem statement is going | |
15:22 | to be equal to Q of x Times X -3 | |
15:27 | because we divided by X -3 plus the remainder . | |
15:31 | But what I'm trying to say is this checking of | |
15:34 | the work here works for for for the polynomial whatever | |
15:38 | you've divided by When you multiply these guys and add | |
15:41 | the remainder , it must be what is you must | |
15:43 | recover what is uh under here . And this is | |
15:47 | equivalent . What we're saying is the polynomial is actually | |
15:50 | equal to this thing , whatever it is . So | |
15:52 | that means I can put whatever value of X into | |
15:55 | both sides that I want to . So what if | |
15:58 | I want to continue , I will say , well | |
16:00 | what if I want to evaluate the polynomial at the | |
16:03 | value of three ? That's what I want to do | |
16:05 | . So that means that I'll take the quotient that | |
16:08 | I get as an answer and then I'm gonna plug | |
16:11 | the value of three in here , right ? Um | |
16:16 | And I'm gonna have to add my remainder . Notice | |
16:18 | what's happened here , 3 -3 is zero . I | |
16:20 | guess what I'm trying to say is when you divide | |
16:23 | by this , you're dividing by a very special thing | |
16:27 | and you're dividing by X -3 because eventually I want | |
16:30 | to plug in a value of three there . So | |
16:32 | what is going to happen is when I plug a | |
16:34 | value of three in there , this goes to zero | |
16:36 | . So P evaluated at three is equal to zero | |
16:40 | plus the remainder , which means the value evaluated at | |
16:43 | three of this polynomial is equal to the remainder , | |
16:46 | which is equal to five . So , the the | |
16:49 | uh polynomial evaluated at three is equal to five . | |
16:54 | All right . And this is not a proof , | |
16:56 | but this is showing you that it works and why | |
16:58 | it works . The reason why it works is because | |
17:00 | when you do division what you have is the answer | |
17:03 | that you get at the top times your divisor and | |
17:06 | then you add your remainder in . But if you | |
17:08 | divide this polynomial by a very special number , A | |
17:11 | number such that if I am trying to evaluate it | |
17:14 | , X is equal to three . I'm gonna put | |
17:15 | X -3 here so that I will get a zero | |
17:18 | here . Then whenever that happens the remainder is what | |
17:21 | is equal to what I'm trying to find . And | |
17:23 | it always works out that way . If I'm trying | |
17:25 | to evaluate the polynomial X is equal to 10 , | |
17:28 | then I want to divide by x minus 10 . | |
17:31 | Why ? Because when I put the 10 in here | |
17:33 | which would be like 10 minus 10 Be divided . | |
17:36 | He basically divided by X -10 . So this equation | |
17:39 | will be having X -10 year But I'm gonna put | |
17:41 | the value of 10 and here which drops the whole | |
17:43 | term out . So that's why it's not so much | |
17:45 | of a coincidence that whenever it's not a coincidence that | |
17:49 | you're want to evaluate the polynomial X is equal to | |
17:52 | three and you divide by X -3 . It's not | |
17:55 | a coincidence at all . It's because when you put | |
17:57 | a value of three in here , then when you | |
18:00 | kind of quote unquote , check the polynomial , the | |
18:04 | this term drops away . So whatever you're trying to | |
18:07 | evaluate at , you divide by X minus that and | |
18:11 | then the remainder that you have left over is always | |
18:13 | going to be equal to the number that you seek | |
18:15 | . That's why it works . All right . So | |
18:17 | I want to do one more problem . I know | |
18:19 | it's a little bit fuzzy . I mean even to | |
18:21 | me I know what the sterile means , but it's | |
18:23 | a little bit weird . But the reason it works | |
18:24 | is because of the way division works . When we | |
18:27 | divide by things , then in order to check them | |
18:30 | , we have to backwards multiply and and and plug | |
18:32 | in and add the remainder back in . So if | |
18:34 | we divide by the by the very special thing that | |
18:37 | we that we we we know we're going to get | |
18:39 | it's gonna drop away to zero . If we basically | |
18:42 | divide by X minus the number that we're trying to | |
18:46 | evaluate at the term drops away and then the answer | |
18:49 | is what the remainder is . So it's kind of | |
18:50 | going a backdoor way of figuring out what that polynomial | |
18:53 | is equal to . So just give one more example | |
18:56 | , we're gonna use the remainder theorem to evaluate the | |
18:59 | following polynomial P of x X Cubed -2 , x | |
19:04 | squared -5 X -7 . And we're gonna evaluate , | |
19:10 | we want to find P of four . We want | |
19:14 | to find the value of P is equal divorce . | |
19:16 | So this means in terms of our theorem , C | |
19:19 | is equal to four . What do I mean by | |
19:20 | sea ? The theorem says if a polynomial P of | |
19:24 | X is divided by x minus C , then the | |
19:27 | remainder is the value P of C . So I | |
19:30 | kind of bring the letter C . And they're not | |
19:32 | to confuse you just because it's kind of a generalized | |
19:34 | thing . And that's how the theorems are written in | |
19:36 | your books . But the bottom line is if I'm | |
19:38 | trying to evaluate this thing at P is equal to | |
19:42 | four , all I have to do is find the | |
19:43 | remainder when I take P of X and I divided | |
19:46 | by x minus four . Right ? So I divide | |
19:50 | by X -4 because there is a positive for in | |
19:52 | there , I divide by X -C . In terms | |
19:54 | of the theorem . So I'm divided by X -4 | |
19:56 | right there . So I can say that uh the | |
20:01 | remainder I get when I do that is going to | |
20:03 | be equal to this value here . Right ? So | |
20:05 | now I want to divide it . Now I can | |
20:06 | do long division , I can take this thing and | |
20:08 | I can divide by x minus four . That would | |
20:10 | work fine . But I like synthetic division , that's | |
20:12 | actually easier to do . So I'm gonna do synthetic | |
20:14 | division one , X cube minus two , X squared | |
20:18 | minus five X minus seven . And I'm gonna divide | |
20:20 | that by X -4 . But for long debate for | |
20:23 | synthetic division , I have to switch the sign , | |
20:25 | make it for . So then I'm gonna go down | |
20:29 | and drop a one and then I do it four | |
20:31 | times one is four , add these together , I'm | |
20:33 | gonna get it to two times four is eight , | |
20:36 | Add these together , I'll get a 33 times four | |
20:39 | is 12 , and I'll add these together and I | |
20:41 | will get a five . And the only number that | |
20:43 | I care about is the very last one . The | |
20:45 | remainder . So the remainder is equal to five . | |
20:50 | So that means because of the serum that this polynomial | |
20:54 | evaluated at the number four is equal to five . | |
20:57 | You don't have to think about it . You don't | |
20:59 | have to go through the whole , this is , | |
21:00 | I'm going to check this polynomial by doing this and | |
21:03 | substance . You don't have to do any of that | |
21:04 | . The purpose of this was just to show you | |
21:07 | why it works . It works because if I take | |
21:09 | a polynomial and divide by something , I'm gonna have | |
21:11 | this format with a remainder to check it . The | |
21:14 | original polynomial is always going to be equal to the | |
21:18 | answer . You get times what you divided by plus | |
21:23 | the remainder . So if you divide by something very | |
21:26 | closely related to what you're trying to evaluate here , | |
21:29 | in this case we're doing um X is equal to | |
21:31 | three . We wanted to evaluate P is equal to | |
21:34 | P . Of three . What we're trying to do | |
21:36 | then the polynomial was equal to the quotient times the | |
21:41 | divisor plus this . If we plug put a value | |
21:44 | of three in here , the three minus three makes | |
21:46 | it drop out . So that's why we're always dividing | |
21:48 | by something closely related to what we're trying to evaluate | |
21:51 | by . So the bottom line is You don't have | |
21:54 | to think about it . You don't have to go | |
21:56 | through the proof of why it works every time . | |
21:58 | But I do like you to know where things come | |
21:59 | from . What you do is give you a polynomial | |
22:02 | . They say fine p evaluated at four you say | |
22:05 | , Okay , I'm gonna divide by X -4 . | |
22:07 | Now . You can do that with long division as | |
22:09 | we did before . Or you can do it with | |
22:10 | synthetic division . We do a synthetic division . We | |
22:12 | have to change the sign of this number . We | |
22:15 | do this in the synthetic division process , we get | |
22:17 | a remainder of five . So five . So we | |
22:19 | know that P4 is equal to five . The remainder | |
22:22 | of a polynomial is always equal to that polynomial divided | |
22:26 | by um When it's divided by X minus the number | |
22:30 | , so the better way to think about it is | |
22:32 | generally how you'll see it in your textbook . If | |
22:35 | a polynomial is divided by x minus something , then | |
22:38 | the remainder . When you do that division is the | |
22:40 | value P evaluated at sea . These are always going | |
22:42 | to be the same number . If you want P | |
22:44 | evaluated at 34 , divide by X -34 . Find | |
22:48 | the remainder . If you want P evaluated at seven | |
22:51 | , divide by x minus seven . Find the remainder | |
22:53 | if you want P at negative two because they can | |
22:56 | be negative too . If you want to be evaluated | |
22:58 | at negative two , then divide by X plus two | |
23:01 | . Because you can have x minus of minus two | |
23:03 | , divide by X plus two and then find that | |
23:05 | remainder . So make sure you understand this and do | |
23:08 | all of these problems yourself , Follow me on to | |
23:10 | the next lesson , we'll get a little more practice | |
23:12 | with the remainder theorem in algebra . |
Summarizer
DESCRIPTION:
Quality Math And Science Videos that feature step-by-step example problems!
OVERVIEW:
10 - The Remainder Theorem of Synthetic Division & Polynomial Long Division - Part 1 is a free educational video by Math and Science.
This page not only allows students and teachers view 10 - The Remainder Theorem of Synthetic Division & Polynomial Long Division - Part 1 videos but also find engaging Sample Questions, Apps, Pins, Worksheets, Books related to the following topics.