Math Antic - Simplifying Square Roots - By mathantics
Transcript
00:03 | Uh huh . Hi , I'm rob . Welcome to | |
00:07 | Math Antics in this lesson , We're going to learn | |
00:09 | a bit more about roots and how you can simplify | |
00:12 | them . Have you ever noticed that teachers can be | |
00:14 | kind of picky sometimes ? Like if you give them | |
00:17 | an answer that's not in the form they want , | |
00:19 | you might lose a point even if the answer is | |
00:22 | technically correct . That's partly because in math there are | |
00:25 | many different ways to write the exact same number or | |
00:28 | expression , but some are much more clear and helpful | |
00:31 | than others . Take the number one . For example | |
00:33 | , you can write it as the fraction 2/2 or | |
00:36 | you could write it as the expression one plus zero | |
00:39 | . You could even write it as the square root | |
00:41 | of one if you wanted to . The possibilities are | |
00:43 | endless . But if it's the answer to your problem | |
00:46 | , why would you use any of these more complicated | |
00:48 | forms when you could just write one ? Isn't that | |
00:51 | a lot simpler ? It sure is . And math | |
00:53 | teachers always like it when answers are written in the | |
00:56 | simplest form possible . So let's suppose you do a | |
00:59 | math problem and get the answer the square root of | |
01:02 | 16 , You can just leave it like that and | |
01:04 | it wouldn't be wrong . But can you think of | |
01:06 | a simpler way to write it ? Of course 16 | |
01:09 | is a perfect square , it equals four times four | |
01:12 | . So the square root of 16 is just four | |
01:15 | . That's definitely a simpler answer . But what if | |
01:18 | you do a different problem and end up with the | |
01:20 | answer ? The square root of 32 ? Well 32 | |
01:24 | isn't a perfect square . So we can't simplify it | |
01:27 | to a nice hole number . Like we could with | |
01:28 | the square root of 16 , you might consider using | |
01:32 | a calculator to convert it to a decimal value . | |
01:34 | But in this case we would end up with an | |
01:36 | irrational number , which is a never ending , never | |
01:39 | repeating decimal and that's definitely not a simpler way to | |
01:42 | write it . So what other options do we have | |
01:45 | ? Well , some of you may notice that 32 | |
01:48 | could be factored into 16 times too . Right . | |
01:51 | And we already know that 16 is a perfect square | |
01:55 | . But does that help us out ? Actually , | |
01:57 | it does because of a particular rule about square roots | |
02:00 | . That rule says if you have to square roots | |
02:03 | that are being multiplied together , like the square root | |
02:05 | of two times the square root of three , you | |
02:08 | can combine them like this , the square root of | |
02:10 | two times three and you can go the other way | |
02:13 | too and un combine them . So if you start | |
02:15 | with the square root of two times three you could | |
02:18 | change it to the square root of two times the | |
02:20 | square root of three . We can use that rule | |
02:23 | to our advantage in our current problem because we just | |
02:26 | figured out that the square root of 32 is the | |
02:28 | same as the square root of 16 times two , | |
02:31 | which means we could rewrite it as the square root | |
02:34 | of 16 times the square root of two . And | |
02:37 | as we already know , the square root of 16 | |
02:39 | can be simplified to just four . So that gives | |
02:42 | us four times the square root of two or just | |
02:44 | four route to as a simplified version . Pretty cool | |
02:47 | . Huh ? Hold on a second . How is | |
02:50 | that answer ? Simpler than what you had before Before | |
02:53 | you just had the square root of 32 and now | |
02:56 | you have a whole number times a route that seems | |
02:58 | even more complicated to me . Yeah , I know | |
03:01 | what you mean . Sometimes it's hard for people to | |
03:04 | decide what the simplest or most helpful form is . | |
03:08 | So mathematicians rely on what are called conventions where they | |
03:12 | all agree on a preferred way to express things . | |
03:14 | Ooh that sounds fun . A convention for math . | |
03:18 | Like math con Hey hey hey , would you like | |
03:24 | a selfie with the math antics guy ? Oh that | |
03:26 | that's okay . Thanks . Anyway , I'm actually looking | |
03:29 | for the khan academy booth . Oh there it is | |
03:33 | . Mhm . Gone . Gone . Well it's true | |
03:40 | that the word convention often refers to a group of | |
03:43 | people meeting together in a big building . But when | |
03:46 | I say convention , I mean it's a conventional or | |
03:49 | standard way of doing something . Hey , want to | |
03:52 | see a picture of me and sal khan . Anyway | |
03:55 | in math it's conventional to simplify a route . If | |
03:58 | you can simplifying a route means identifying any factors under | |
04:03 | the radical sign that if you took the route of | |
04:05 | them would simplify to a whole number , which you | |
04:08 | could then bring out in front of the radical sign | |
04:11 | even though the result might seem less simple than before | |
04:14 | . If the part under the radical sign has been | |
04:16 | made as simple or as small as possible , then | |
04:19 | you've simplified the route . This definition of simplifying would | |
04:23 | apply to any type of root , square roots , | |
04:25 | cube roots , fourth roots and so on before the | |
04:28 | next couple examples will just focus on square roots since | |
04:32 | they're the kind you'll encounter most often in the case | |
04:35 | of square roots . To simplify , you'll need to | |
04:37 | find out if there's any perfect squares hiding in the | |
04:39 | number under the radical science . You remember what a | |
04:42 | perfect square is , right ? It's just what you | |
04:44 | get when you multiply a whole number by itself , | |
04:47 | like two times two or five times five or 30 | |
04:50 | times 30 . And how would you find out if | |
04:53 | there are any perfect squares hidden in that number ? | |
04:55 | The key is to factor it . If you've forgotten | |
04:57 | how factoring works , you can watch our previous videos | |
05:00 | about it for help factoring will reveal if there's any | |
05:03 | pairs of the same factor being multiplied together Like two | |
05:06 | times 2 or three times 3 If there are you | |
05:09 | found a perfect square hiding in that number and you | |
05:12 | can simplify it . Like in this example the prime | |
05:15 | factor ization of 180 is two times two times three | |
05:19 | times three times five . So you can rewrite it | |
05:22 | like this and look for perfect squares two times 2 | |
05:26 | is a perfect square since its value is four and | |
05:29 | three times three is a perfect square since its value | |
05:31 | is nine . Now remember the rule I mentioned earlier | |
05:34 | that says you can rewrite a square root as a | |
05:37 | product of the square root of its factors . That | |
05:40 | means we can rewrite the problem like this . Do | |
05:43 | you see the advantage of doing that now we can | |
05:45 | simplify the square roots of the perfect squares that we | |
05:48 | found so that they just become whole numbers . The | |
05:52 | square root of two times two simplifies to two and | |
05:55 | the square root of three times three simplifies to three | |
05:58 | . That gives us two times three times the square | |
06:00 | root of five . The square root of five can't | |
06:03 | be simplified any further . five is a prime number | |
06:06 | . So it's only factors are one and itself great | |
06:09 | . Now all we have to do is recombine the | |
06:11 | factors , we simplify it two times three equals six | |
06:14 | . So the simplified version of the square root of | |
06:16 | 180 is six times the square root of five or | |
06:20 | six . Route five . Let's try another example to | |
06:23 | make sure you understand what's happening , Let's simplify the | |
06:26 | square root of 72 . If we factor 72 all | |
06:29 | the way down to its prime factors , we get | |
06:31 | two times two times two times three times three . | |
06:34 | As you can see , there are two pairs of | |
06:37 | factors that form perfect squares two times two and three | |
06:40 | times three . And there's a two leftover that doesn't | |
06:43 | form a pair . Like before we could rewrite this | |
06:46 | using our rule about multiplying roots . But now that | |
06:49 | you know how that rule works , you can eliminate | |
06:51 | some of the in between steps . If you realize | |
06:54 | that any pair of identical factors that are under the | |
06:57 | square root sign will simplify to become a single factor | |
07:00 | out in front of the root sign . That means | |
07:03 | you can just change the two times two under the | |
07:06 | root sign into a two out in front of it | |
07:09 | and the three times three to a three out in | |
07:11 | front . That gives us two times three times the | |
07:14 | square root of two or six route to . As | |
07:16 | a simplified answer . So that's basically all there is | |
07:20 | to simplifying square roots . And even though square roots | |
07:23 | are the most common , sometimes you may need to | |
07:25 | simplify other routes to , For example , what if | |
07:28 | you need to simplify the cube root of 72 instead | |
07:31 | ? Well you would start the process the same way | |
07:34 | you factor the number under the root . Sign down | |
07:37 | to its prime factors to see if any parts of | |
07:39 | it can be simplified . But since we're working with | |
07:42 | a cube root this time , that means we aren't | |
07:44 | looking for pairs or perfect squares anymore . Instead we | |
07:48 | need to find factors that are in groups of three | |
07:50 | . In other words , we're looking for perfect cubes | |
07:53 | just like before 72 factors down to two times two | |
07:57 | times two times three times three . But since we're | |
08:00 | dealing with a cube root this time , the two | |
08:02 | times two times two can be simplified because it's a | |
08:05 | perfect cube , but the three times three can't because | |
08:08 | it's a perfect square . Also , like before we | |
08:11 | can use our rule to break this problem up into | |
08:14 | the cube root of two times two times two times | |
08:17 | the cube root of three times three . This first | |
08:20 | part simplifies to two . Well , the second part | |
08:23 | can't be simplified any further , so we just recombine | |
08:26 | it to the cube root of nine there . The | |
08:28 | simplified version of the cube root of 72 is two | |
08:32 | times the cube root of nine . So when simplifying | |
08:35 | roots in general , it's important to pay attention to | |
08:38 | which kind of route you're dealing with . So you | |
08:40 | know , which factors can be simplified and which can't | |
08:43 | basically , you just look at the index number and | |
08:46 | then try to find groups of identical factors of that | |
08:48 | size for square roots . It's groups of two for | |
08:52 | cube roots , groups of three for fourth roots , | |
08:54 | it's groups of four and so on . Hopefully that | |
08:57 | all makes sense . But if you're still having trouble | |
09:00 | getting it , I'd highly recommend re watching our videos | |
09:03 | about exponents and routes because it's super important to fully | |
09:07 | understand how they work before you can understand how to | |
09:10 | simplify them . Oh , and there's one more quick | |
09:13 | thing that I want to mention in this video that | |
09:15 | has to do with conventions about roots . Sometimes an | |
09:18 | answer to a math problem might be a fraction with | |
09:21 | a root in the denominator like this . one , | |
09:23 | three over the square root of two . The square | |
09:26 | root of two can't be simplified . But many mathematicians | |
09:30 | like to avoid having roots in the denominator , especially | |
09:33 | when those roots are irrational numbers . So if your | |
09:36 | teacher asked you to rewrite this fraction without a root | |
09:39 | in the denominator , how would you do it ? | |
09:41 | Well , think back to when you learn how to | |
09:44 | add or subtract . Unlike fractions , which means fractions | |
09:47 | that don't have the same denominator . In those cases | |
09:51 | you needed to change the fractions to like fractions by | |
09:54 | multiplying one or both of them by a special hole | |
09:57 | fraction . We can apply that same idea to change | |
10:00 | the denominator of this fraction into a regular whole number | |
10:03 | instead of a route . All we have to do | |
10:05 | is make a whole fraction out of that radical denominator | |
10:09 | . In this case that would be square root of | |
10:11 | two over square root of two . Then we multiply | |
10:14 | our original fraction by that new whole fraction whose value | |
10:17 | is just one on the top . We would get | |
10:20 | three times the square root of two on the bottom | |
10:22 | . We would get squared of two times square root | |
10:24 | of two , which by definition will just equal to | |
10:28 | . So these two fractions are equivalent . They represent | |
10:31 | the exact same value , but one has a radical | |
10:34 | in the denominator while the other has a radical in | |
10:37 | the numerator , neither answer would be wrong . But | |
10:40 | if there has to be a radical or a root | |
10:42 | and a fraction , then mathematicians prefer to have it | |
10:45 | in the numerator as a convention If you'd like to | |
10:48 | research this idea further , it's often called rationalizing the | |
10:52 | denominator because it's a way to change a fraction so | |
10:55 | that it has an irrational numerator instead of an irrational | |
10:58 | denominator , which makes some mathematicians feel much better . | |
11:02 | All right , that's all for this video . Hopefully | |
11:06 | it's given you a better understanding of some of the | |
11:08 | conventions in math concerning roots . Knowing about them can | |
11:11 | come in handy on tests in particular . For example | |
11:14 | , if you solve a problem and get the answer | |
11:17 | square root of 72 , but the multiple choice answers | |
11:20 | available to you are all in simplified form , like | |
11:23 | six route to you'll realize that you just have to | |
11:25 | simplify your answer so you know which one to pick | |
11:29 | and remember Math is a subject that you can't truly | |
11:32 | learn just by watching . You actually have to apply | |
11:34 | it . So be sure to practice simplifying routes on | |
11:37 | your own . As always . Thanks for watching Math | |
11:39 | antics and I'll see you next time . Hey , | |
11:43 | you wanna selfie with the Math Antics guy ? Learn | |
11:56 | more at Math antics dot com . |
Summarizer
DESCRIPTION:
OVERVIEW:
Math Antic - Simplifying Square Roots is a free educational video by mathantics.
This page not only allows students and teachers view Math Antic - Simplifying Square Roots videos but also find engaging Sample Questions, Apps, Pins, Worksheets, Books related to the following topics.