Heretics

- By Gilbert K. Chesterton
Font Size
English author and Christian apologist (1874–1936) Not to be confused with A. K. Chesterton. G. K. ChestertonKC*SGChesterton in 1909BornGilbert Keith Chesterton(1874-05-29)29 May 1874Kensington, London, EnglandDied14 June 1936(1936-06-14) (aged 62)Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, EnglandResting placeRoman Catholic Cemetery, BeaconsfieldOccupationJournalistnovelistessayistpoetEducationUniversity College LondonPeriod1900–1936GenreEssays, fantasy, Christian apologetics, Catholic apologetics, mystery, poetryLiterary movementCatholic literary revival[1]Notable worksThe Napoleon of Notting HillThe Man Who Was ThursdayOrthodoxyFather Brown storiesThe Everlasting ManSpouse Frances Blogg ​(m. 1901)​RelativesCecil Chesterton (brother)A. K. Chesterton (first cousin, once removed)Signature Gilbert Keith Chesterton KC*SG (29 May 1874 – 14 June 1936) was an English author, philosopher, Christian apologist, and literary and art critic.[2] Chesterton created the fictional priest-detective Father Brown,[3] and wrote on apologetics. Even some of those who disagree with him have recognised the wide appeal of such works as Orthodoxy and The Everlasting Man.[4][5] Chesterton routinely referred to himself as an orthodox Christian, and came to identify this position more and more with Catholicism, eventually converting from high church Anglicanism. Biographers have identified him as a successor to such Victorian authors as Matthew Arnold, Thomas Carlyle, John Henry Newman and John Ruskin.[6] He has been referred to as the "prince of paradox".[7] Of his writing style, Time observed: "Whenever possible, Chesterton made his points with popular sayings, proverbs, allegories—first carefully turning them inside out."[4] His writings were an influence on Jorge Luis Borges, who compared his work with that of Edgar Allan Poe.[8] Part of a series onCatholic philosophy  Aquinas, Scotus, and Ockham Ethics Cardinal virtues Just price Just war Principle of Double Effect Probabilism Natural law Personalism Social teaching Liberation Theology Christian Humanism Virtue ethics Works of mercy Metaphysics Conceptualism Realism Moderate realism Nominalism Quiddity (essence / nature) Haecceity Quinque Viae Predestination Theological determinism Compatibilism Divine Attributes Schools Augustinianism Victorines Llullism Cartesianism Christian Neoplatonism Friends of God Molinism Ressourcement Occamism Scholasticism Second scholasticism Neo Scotism Thomism Analytic Salamanca Philosophers Ancient Ambrose Athanasius Augustine Benedict Boethius Clement Cyprian Cyril Gregory (of Nazianzus) Gregory (of Nyssa) Irenaeus Jerome Cassian Chrysostom Climacus John of Damascus Justin Maximus Dionysius Origen Paul Tertullian Medieval Abelard Albert Anselm Aquinas Bacon Bede Berengar Bernard Bonaventure Buridan Catherine Eckhart Eriugena Giles Gregory I Gundissalinus Hildegard Hugh Isidore Llull Lombard Martin Nicholas Ockham Oresme Paschasius Roscellinus Scotus Symeon Thierry Modern Arnauld Ávila Azpilcueta Bellarmine Bonald Bossuet Brentano Botero Cajetan Chateaubriand Cortés Descartes Erasmus Fénelon Gracián Kołłątaj Krasicki La Mennais Liguori Maistre Malebranche Mariana Meinong Mercado Molina More Newman Pascal Rosmini Sales Soto Suárez Vico Vitoria Caramuel Contemporary Adler Anscombe Balthasar Barron Benedict XVI Blondel Chesterton Congar Copleston Finnis Garrigou-Lagrange Geach Gilson Girard Gutiérrez Dávila Guardini Haldane Hildebrand John Paul II Lonergan Lubac MacIntyre Marcel Marion Maritain McLuhan Mounier Pieper Rahner Stein Taylor  Catholicism portal Philosophy portalvte Biography[edit] Early life[edit] Chesterton at the age of 17 Chesterton was born in Campden Hill in Kensington, London, the son of Edward Chesterton (1841–1922), an estate agent, and Marie Louise, née Grosjean, of Swiss French origin.[9][10][11] Chesterton was baptised at the age of one month into the Church of England,[12] though his family themselves were irregularly practising Unitarians.[13] According to his autobiography, as a young man he became fascinated with the occult and, along with his brother Cecil, experimented with Ouija boards.[14] He was educated at St Paul's School, then attended the Slade School of Art to become an illustrator. The Slade is a department of University College London, where Chesterton also took classes in literature, but he did not complete a degree in either subject. He married Frances Blogg in 1901; the marriage lasted the rest of his life. Chesterton credited Frances with leading him back to Anglicanism, though he later considered Anglicanism to be a "pale imitation". He entered in full communion with the Catholic Church in 1922.[15] The couple were unable to have children.[16][17] A friend from schooldays was Edmund Clerihew Bentley, inventor of the clerihew, a whimsical four-line biographical poem. Chesterton himself wrote clerihews and illustrated his friend's first published collection of poetry, Biography for Beginners (1905), which popularised the clerihew form. He became godfather to Bentley's son, Nicolas, and opened his novel The Man Who Was Thursday with a poem written to Bentley. Career[edit] In September 1895, Chesterton began working for the London publisher George Redway, where he remained for just over a year.[18] In October 1896, he moved to the publishing house T. Fisher Unwin,[18] where he remained until 1902. During this period he also undertook his first journalistic work, as a freelance art and literary critic. In 1902, The Daily News gave him a weekly opinion column, followed in 1905 by a weekly column in The Illustrated London News, for which he continued to write for the next thirty years. Early on Chesterton showed a great interest in and talent for art. He had planned to become an artist, and his writing shows a vision that clothed abstract ideas in concrete and memorable images. Father Brown is perpetually correcting the incorrect vision of the bewildered folks at the scene of the crime and wandering off at the end with the criminal to exercise his priestly role of recognition, repentance and reconciliation. For example, in the story "The Flying Stars", Father Brown entreats the character Flambeau to give up his life of crime: "There is still youth and honour and humour in you; don't fancy they will last in that trade. Men may keep a sort of level of good, but no man has ever been able to keep on one level of evil. That road goes down and down. The kind man drinks and turns cruel; the frank man kills and lies about it. Many a man I've known started like you to be an honest outlaw, a merry robber of the rich, and ended stamped into slime."[19] Caricature by Max Beerbohm Chesterton loved to debate, often engaging in friendly public disputes with such men as George Bernard Shaw,[20] H. G. Wells, Bertrand Russell and Clarence Darrow.[21][22] According to his autobiography, he and Shaw played cowboys in a silent film that was never released.[23] On 7 January 1914 Chesterton (along with his brother Cecil and future sister-in-law Ada) took part in the mock-trial of John Jasper for the murder of Edwin Drood. Chesterton was Judge and George Bernard Shaw played the role of foreman of the jury.[24] Chesterton was a large man, standing 6 feet 4 inches (1.93 m) tall and weighing around 20 stone 6 pounds (130 kg; 286 lb). His girth gave rise to an anecdote during the First World War, when a lady in London asked why he was not "out at the Front"; he replied, "If you go round to the side, you will see that I am."[25] On another occasion he remarked to his friend George Bernard Shaw, "To look at you, anyone would think a famine had struck England." Shaw retorted, "To look at you, anyone would think you had caused it."[26] P. G. Wodehouse once described a very loud crash as "a sound like G. K. Chesterton falling onto a sheet of tin".[27] Chesterton usually wore a cape and a crumpled hat, with a swordstick in hand, and a cigar hanging out of his mouth. He had a tendency to forget where he was supposed to be going and miss the train that was supposed to take him there. It is reported that on several occasions he sent a telegram to his wife Frances from an incorrect location, writing such things as "Am in Market Harborough. Where ought I to be?" to which she would reply, "Home".[28] Chesterton himself told this story, omitting, however, his wife's alleged reply, in his autobiography.[29] In 1931, the BBC invited Chesterton to give a series of radio talks. He accepted, tentatively at first. He was allowed (and encouraged) to improvise on the scripts. This allowed his talks to maintain an intimate character, as did the decision to allow his wife and secretary to sit with him during his broadcasts.[30] The talks were very popular. A BBC official remarked, after Chesterton's death, that "in another year or so, he would have become the dominating voice from Broadcasting House."[31] Chesterton was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1935.[32] Chesterton was part of the Detection Club, a society of British mystery authors founded by Anthony Berkeley in 1928. He was elected as the first president and served from 1930 to 1936 till he was succeeded by E. C. Bentley.[33] Death[edit] Telegram sent by Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli (the future Pius XII) on behalf of Pope Pius XI to the people of England following the death of Chesterton Chesterton died of congestive heart failure on 14 June 1936, aged 62, at his home in Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire. His last words were a greeting of good morning spoken to his wife Frances. The sermon at Chesterton's Requiem Mass in Westminster Cathedral, London, was delivered by Ronald Knox on 27 June 1936. Knox said, "All of this generation has grown up under Chesterton's influence so completely that we do not even know when we are thinking Chesterton."[34] He is buried in Beaconsfield in the Catholic Cemetery. Chesterton's estate was probated at £28,389, equivalent to £2,052,132 in 2021.[35] Near the end of Chesterton's life, Pope Pius XI invested him as Knight Commander with Star of the Papal Order of St. Gregory the Great (KC*SG).[31] The Chesterton Society has proposed that he be beatified.[36] Writing[edit] Chesterton wrote around 80 books, several hundred poems, some 200 short stories, 4,000 essays (mostly newspaper columns), and several plays. He was a literary and social critic, historian, playwright, novelist, and Catholic theologian[37][38] and apologist, debater, and mystery writer. He was a columnist for the Daily News, The Illustrated London News, and his own paper, G. K.'s Weekly; he also wrote articles for the Encyclopædia Britannica, including the entry on Charles Dickens and part of the entry on Humour in the 14th edition (1929). His best-known character is the priest-detective Father Brown,[3] who appeared only in short stories, while The Man Who Was Thursday is arguably his best-known novel. He was a convinced Christian long before he was received into the Catholic Church, and Christian themes and symbolism appear in much of his writing. In the United States, his writings on distributism were popularised through The American Review, published by Seward Collins in New York. Of his nonfiction, Charles Dickens: A Critical Study (1906) has received some of the broadest-based praise. According to Ian Ker (The Catholic Revival in English Literature, 1845–1961, 2003), "In Chesterton's eyes Dickens belongs to Merry, not Puritan, England"; Ker treats Chesterton's thought in chapter 4 of that book as largely growing out of his true appreciation of Dickens, a somewhat shop-soiled property in the view of other literary opinions of the time. The biography was largely responsible for creating a popular revival for Dickens's work as well as a serious reconsideration of Dickens by scholars.[39] Chesterton's writings consistently displayed wit and a sense of humour. He employed paradox, while making serious comments on the world, government, politics, economics, philosophy, theology and many other topics.[40][41] T. S. Eliot summed up his work as follows: He was importantly and consistently on the side of the angels. Behind the Johnsonian fancy dress, so reassuring to the British public, he concealed the most serious and revolutionary designs—concealing them by exposure ... Chesterton's social and economic ideas ... were fundamentally Christian and Catholic. He did more, I think, than any man of his time—and was able to do more than anyone else, because of his particular background, development and abilities as a public performer—to maintain the existence of the important minority in the modern world. He leaves behind a permanent claim upon our loyalty, to see that the work that he did in his time is continued in ours.[42] Eliot commented further that "His poetry was first-rate journalistic balladry, and I do not suppose that he took it more seriously than it deserved. He reached a high imaginative level with The Napoleon of Notting Hill, and higher with The Man Who Was Thursday, romances in which he turned the Stevensonian fantasy to more serious purpose. His book on Dickens seems to me the best essay on that author that has ever been written. Some of his essays can be read again and again; though of his essay-writing as a whole, one can only say that it is remarkable to have maintained such a high average with so large an output."[42] In 2022, a three-volume bibliography of Chesterton was published, listing 9000 contributions he made to newspapers, magazines, and journals, as well as 200 books and 3000 articles about him.[43] Contemporaries[edit] "Chesterbelloc"[edit] See also: G. K.'s Weekly George Bernard Shaw, Hilaire Belloc, and G. K. Chesterton Chesterton is often associated with his close friend, the poet and essayist Hilaire Belloc.[44][45] George Bernard Shaw coined the name "Chesterbelloc"[46] for their partnership,[47] and this stuck. Though they were very different men, they shared many beliefs;[48] in 1922, Chesterton joined Belloc in the Catholic faith, and both voiced criticisms of capitalism and socialism.[49] They instead espoused a third way: distributism.[50] G. K.'s Weekly, which occupied much of Chesterton's energy in the last 15 years of his life, was the successor to Belloc's New Witness, taken over from Cecil Chesterton, Gilbert's brother, who died in World War I. In his book On the Place of Gilbert Chesterton in English Letters, Belloc wrote that "Everything he wrote upon any one of the great English literary names was of the first quality. He summed up any one pen (that of Jane Austen, for instance) in exact sentences; sometimes in a single sentence, after a fashion which no one else has approached. He stood quite by himself in this department. He understood the very minds (to take the two most famous names) of Thackeray and of Dickens. He understood and presented Meredith. He understood the supremacy in Milton. He understood Pope. He understood the great Dryden. He was not swamped as nearly all his contemporaries were by Shakespeare, wherein they drown as in a vast sea – for that is what Shakespeare is. Gilbert Chesterton continued to understand the youngest and latest comers as he understood the forefathers in our great corpus of English verse and prose."[51] Wilde[edit] In his book Heretics, Chesterton said this of Oscar Wilde: "The same lesson [of the pessimistic pleasure-seeker] was taught by the very powerful and very desolate philosophy of Oscar Wilde. It is the carpe diem religion; but the carpe diem religion is not the religion of happy people, but of very unhappy people. Great joy does not gather the rosebuds while it may; its eyes are fixed on the immortal rose which Dante saw."[52] More briefly, and with a closer approximation to Wilde's own style, he wrote in his 1908 book Orthodoxy concerning the necessity of making symbolic sacrifices for the gift of creation: "Oscar Wilde said that sunsets were not valued because we could not pay for sunsets. But Oscar Wilde was wrong; we can pay for sunsets. We can pay for them by not being Oscar Wilde." Shaw[edit] Chesterton and George Bernard Shaw were famous friends and enjoyed their arguments and discussions. Although rarely in agreement, they each maintained good will toward, and respect for, the other.[53] In his writing, Chesterton expressed himself very plainly on where they differed and why. In Heretics he writes of Shaw: After belabouring a great many people for a great many years for being unprogressive, Mr Shaw has discovered, with characteristic sense, that it is very doubtful whether any existing human being with two legs can be progressive at all. Having come to doubt whether humanity can be combined with progress, most people, easily pleased, would have elected to abandon progress and remain with humanity. Mr Shaw, not being easily pleased, decides to throw over humanity with all its limitations and go in for progress for its own sake. If man, as we know him, is incapable of the philosophy of progress, Mr Shaw asks, not for a new kind of philosophy, but for a new kind of man. It is rather as if a nurse had tried a rather bitter food for some years on a baby, and on discovering that it was not suitable, should not throw away the food and ask for a new food, but throw the baby out of window, and ask for a new baby.[54] Views[edit] Advocacy of Catholicism[edit] Part of the Politics series onToryism Characteristics Agrarianism Classicism Counterrevolution High Church (Anglicanism) High culture Interventionism Loyalism Monarchism Noblesse oblige Traditionalism Traditional Catholicism Royalism Unionism General topics Cavaliers Cavalier Parliament Château Clique Conservative corporatism Divine right of kings Family Compact Jacobitism Oxford Movement Powellism People Robert Filmer 1st Earl of Clarendon Roger L'Estrange 1st Earl of Rochester 1st Viscount Bolingbroke Samuel Johnson 3rd Earl of Bute 1st Duke of Wellington Walter Scott Stanley Baldwin G. K. Chesterton Winston Churchill Enoch Powell George Grant Related topics Carlism Chouans Cristeros Conservatism Distributism High Tory Legitimism Loyalism Miguelism Pink Tory Reactionary Red Tory Spanish American royalism Sanfedismo Tory socialism Traditionalist conservatism Ultra-Tories Vendéens Viva Maria Veronese Easter vte Chesterton's views, in contrast to Shaw and others, became increasingly focused towards the Church. In Orthodoxy he wrote: "The worship of will is the negation of will ... If Mr Bernard Shaw comes up to me and says, 'Will something', that is tantamount to saying, 'I do not mind what you will', and that is tantamount to saying, 'I have no will in the matter.' You cannot admire will in general, because the essence of will is that it is particular."[55] Chesterton's The Everlasting Man contributed to C. S. Lewis's conversion to Christianity. In a letter to Sheldon Vanauken (14 December 1950),[56] Lewis called the book "the best popular apologetic I know",[57] and to Rhonda Bodle he wrote (31 December 1947)[58] "the [very] best popular defence of the full Christian position I know is G. K. Chesterton's The Everlasting Man". The book was also cited in a list of 10 books that "most shaped his vocational attitude and philosophy of life".[59] Chesterton's hymn "O God of Earth and Altar" was printed in The Commonwealth and then included in The English Hymnal in 1906.[60] Several lines of the hymn appear in the beginning of the song "Revelations" by the British heavy metal band Iron Maiden on their 1983 album Piece of Mind.[61] Lead singer Bruce Dickinson in an interview stated "I have a fondness for hymns. I love some of the ritual, the beautiful words, Jerusalem and there was another one, with words by G. K. Chesterton O God of Earth and Altar – very fire and brimstone: 'Bow down and hear our cry'. I used that for an Iron Maiden song, "Revelations". In my strange and clumsy way I was trying to say look it's all the same stuff."[62] Étienne Gilson praised Chesterton's book on Thomas Aquinas: "I consider it as being, without possible comparison, the best book ever written on Saint Thomas ... the few readers who have spent twenty or thirty years in studying St. Thomas Aquinas, and who, perhaps, have themselves published two or three volumes on the subject, cannot fail to perceive that the so-called 'wit' of Chesterton has put their scholarship to shame."[63] Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, the author of 70 books, identified Chesterton as the stylist who had the greatest impact on his own writing, stating in his autobiography Treasure in Clay, "the greatest influence in writing was G. K. Chesterton who never used a useless word, who saw the value of a paradox, and avoided what was trite."[64] Chesterton wrote the introduction to Sheen's book God and Intelligence in Modern Philosophy; A Critical Study in the Light of the Philosophy of Saint Thomas.[65] Common Sense[edit] This article is part of a series onConservatismin the United Kingdom Ideologies British nationalism Cameronism Muscular liberalism Civic Compassionate Green Liberal Thatcherism Neo One-nation Powellism Progressive Toryism High Red Social Ultra Principles British unionism Classical liberalism Elitism Aristocracy Meritocracy Noblesse oblige Family values Imperialism Loyalism Moral absolutism Protectionism Royalism Social hierarchy Social market economy Sovereignty State church Tradition Intellectuals Belloc Burke Carlyle Chesterton Coleridge Dalrymple Dawson Cowling Eliot Ferguson Hayek Hitchens Hume Johnson (Paul) Johnson (Samuel) Joseph Kipling Lewis More Murray Newman Oakeshott Roberts Ruskin Scott Scruton Southey Sullivan Tolkien Waugh Wordsworth Worsthorne Works A Vindication of Natural Society (1756) Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) "Tamworth Manifesto" (1834) Coningsby (1844) Sybil (1845) Orthodoxy (1908) The Servile State (1912) "Tradition and the Individual Talent" (1919) The Abolition of Man (1943) The Left Was Never Right (1945) Our Culture, What's Left of It (2005) The Rage Against God (2010) The Great Degeneration (2013) How to Be a Conservative (2014) Conservatism: An Invitation to the Great Tradition (2017) The Madness of Crowds (2019) Politicians Baldwin Balfour Braverman Burke Cameron Canning Churchill Disraeli Gove Hannan Hayes Hogg Johnson Joseph Leigh Macmillan May Peel Pitt Powell Rees-Mogg Salisbury Thatcher Willetts Parties Alliance EPP: European People's Party UK Christian Party Christian Peoples Alliance Conservative and Unionist Party Democratic Unionist Party For Britain Movement Heritage Party Traditional Unionist Voice Tories UK Independence Party Ulster Unionist Party Veterans and People's Party Organisations Bright Blue Blue Collar Conservativism Centre for Policy Studies Cornerstone Group One Nation Conservatives Orange Order Tory Reform Group Traditional Britain Group Media Daily Express Sunday Express Daily Mail The Daily Telegraph Evening Standard GB News The Mail on Sunday The Salisbury Review The Spectator The Sun The Sun on Sunday The Sunday Telegraph The Sunday Times TalkTV The Times Related topics Anglo-Catholicism Blue Labour Brexit Politics of the United Kingdom Liberalism Socialism Young England  Conservatism portal  United Kingdom portalvte Chesterton has been called "The Apostle of Common Sense".[66] He was critical of the thinkers and popular philosophers of the day, who though very clever, were saying things that were nonsensical. This is illustrated again in Orthodoxy: "Thus when Mr H. G. Wells says (as he did somewhere), 'All chairs are quite different', he utters not merely a misstatement, but a contradiction in terms. If all chairs were quite different, you could not call them 'all chairs'."[67] Chesterton was an early member of the Fabian Society but resigned at the time of the Boer War.[68] He is often identified as a traditionalist conservative[69][70] due to his staunch support of tradition, expressed in Orthodoxy and other works with Burkean quotes such as the following: Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our groom; tradition asks us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our father.[71] Chesterton also called himself "the last liberal".[72] On War[edit] Chesterton first emerged as a journalist just after the turn of the 20th century. His great, and very lonely, opposition to the Second Boer War, set him very much apart from most of the rest of the British press. Chesterton was a Little Englander, opposed to imperialism, British or otherwise. Chesterton thought that Great Britain betrayed her own principles in the Boer Wars. In vivid contrast to his opposition to the Boer Wars, Chesterton vigorously defended and encouraged the Allies in World War I. "The war was in Chesterton's eyes a crusade, and he was certain that England was right to fight as she had been wrong in fighting the Boers."[73] Chesterton saw the roots of the war in Prussian militarism. He was deeply disturbed by Prussia's unprovoked invasion and occupation of neutral Belgium and by reports of shocking atrocities the Imperial German Army was allegedly committing in Belgium. Over the course of the War, Chesterton wrote hundreds of essays defending it, attacking pacifism, and exhorting the public to persevere until victory. Some of these essays were collected in the 1916 work, The Barbarism of Berlin.[74] One of Chesterton's most successful works in support of the War was his 1915 tongue-in-cheek The Crimes of England.[75] The work is masterfully ironic, supposedly apologizing and trying to help a fictitious Prussian professor named Whirlwind make the case for Prussia in WWI, while actually attacking Prussia throughout. Part of the book's humorous impact is the conceit that Professor Whirlwind never realizes how his supposed benefactor is undermining Prussia at every turn. Chesterton "blames" England for historically building up Prussia against Austria, and for its pacifism, especially among wealthy British Quaker political donors, who prevented Britain from standing up to past Prussian aggression. Accusations of antisemitism[edit] Chesterton faced accusations of antisemitism during his lifetime, saying in his 1920 book The New Jerusalem that it was something "for which my friends and I were for a long period rebuked and even reviled".[76] Despite his protestations to the contrary, the accusation continues to be repeated.[77] An early supporter of Captain Dreyfus, by 1906 he had turned into an anti-dreyfusard.[78] From the early 20th century, his fictional work included caricatures of Jews, stereotyping them as greedy, cowardly, disloyal and communists.[79] Martin Gardner suggests that Four Faultless Felons was allowed to go out of print in the United States because of the "anti-Semitism which mars so many pages."[80] The Marconi scandal of 1912–1913 brought issues of anti-Semitism into the political mainstream. Senior ministers in the Liberal government had secretly profited from advance knowledge of deals regarding wireless telegraphy, and critics regarded it as relevant that some of the key players were Jewish.[81] According to historian Todd Endelman, who identified Chesterton as among the most vocal critics, "The Jew-baiting at the time of the Boer War and the Marconi scandal was linked to a broader protest, mounted in the main by the Radical wing of the Liberal Party, against the growing visibility of successful businessmen in national life and their challenge to what were seen as traditional English values."[82] In a work of 1917, titled A Short History of England, Chesterton considers the royal decree of 1290 by which Edward I expelled Jews from England, a policy that remained in place until 1655. Chesterton writes that popular perception of Jewish moneylenders could well have led Edward I's subjects to regard him as a "tender father of his people" for "breaking the rule by which the rulers had hitherto fostered their bankers' wealth". He felt that Jews, "a sensitive and highly civilized people" who "were the capitalists of the age, the men with wealth banked ready for use", might legitimately complain that "Christian kings and nobles, and even Christian popes and bishops, used for Christian purposes (such as the Crusades and the cathedrals) the money that could only be accumulated in such mountains by a usury they inconsistently denounced as unchristian; and then, when worse times came, gave up the Jew to the fury of the poor".[83][84] In The New Jerusalem Chesterton dedicated a chapter to his views on the Jewish question: the sense that Jews were a distinct people without a homeland of their own, living as foreigners in countries where they were always a minority.[85] He wrote that in the past, his position: was always called Anti-Semitism; but it was always much more true to call it Zionism. ... my friends and I had in some general sense a policy in the matter; and it was in substance the desire to give Jews the dignity and status of a separate nation. We desired that in some fashion, and so far as possible, Jews should be represented by Jews, should live in a society of Jews, should be judged by Jews and ruled by Jews. I am an Anti-Semite if that is Anti-Semitism. It would seem more rational to call it Semitism.[86] In the same place he proposed the thought experiment (describing it as "a parable" and "a flippant fancy") that Jews should be admitted to any role in English public life on condition that they must wear distinctively Middle Eastern garb, explaining that "The point is that we should know where we are; and he would know where he is, which is in a foreign land."[86] Chesterton, like Belloc, openly expressed his abhorrence of Adolf Hitler's rule almost as soon as it started.[87] As Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise wrote in a posthumous tribute to Chesterton in 1937: When Hitlerism came, he was one of the first to speak out with all the directness and frankness of a great and unabashed spirit. Blessing to his memory![88] In The Truth About the Tribes Chesterton attacked Nazi racial theories, writing: "the essence of Nazi Nationalism is to preserve the purity of a race in a continent where all races are impure".[89] The historian Simon Mayers points out that Chesterton wrote in works such as The Crank, The Heresy of Race, and The Barbarian as Bore against the concept of racial superiority and critiqued pseudo-scientific race theories, saying they were akin to a new religion.[79] In The Truth About the Tribes Chesterton wrote, "the curse of race religion is that it makes each separate man the sacred image which he worships. His own bones are the sacred relics; his own blood is the blood of St. Januarius".[79] Mayers records that despite "his hostility towards Nazi antisemitism … [it is unfortunate that he made] claims that 'Hitlerism' was a form of Judaism, and that the Jews were partly responsible for race theory".[79] In The Judaism of Hitler, as well as in A Queer Choice and The Crank, Chesterton made much of the fact that the very notion of "a Chosen Race" was of Jewish origin, saying in The Crank: "If there is one outstanding quality in Hitlerism it is its Hebraism" and "the new Nordic Man has all the worst faults of the worst Jews: jealousy, greed, the mania of conspiracy, and above all, the belief in a Chosen Race".[79] Mayers also shows that Chesterton portrayed Jews not only as culturally and religiously distinct, but racially as well. In The Feud of the Foreigner (1920) he said that the Jew "is a foreigner far more remote from us than is a Bavarian from a Frenchman; he is divided by the same type of division as that between us and a Chinaman or a Hindoo. He not only is not, but never was, of the same race".[79] In The Everlasting Man, while writing about human sacrifice, Chesterton suggested that medieval stories about Jews killing children might have resulted from a distortion of genuine cases of devil worship. Chesterton wrote: [T]he Hebrew prophets were perpetually protesting against the Hebrew race relapsing into an idolatry that involved such a war upon children; and it is probable enough that this abominable apostasy from the God of Israel has occasionally appeared in Israel since, in the form of what is called ritual murder; not of course by any representative of the religion of Judaism, but by individual and irresponsible diabolists who did happen to be Jews.[79][90] The American Chesterton Society has devoted a whole issue of its magazine, Gilbert, to defending Chesterton against charges of antisemitism.[91] Likewise, Ann Farmer, author of Chesterton and the Jews: Friend, Critic, Defender,[92][93] writes, "Public figures from Winston Churchill to Wells proposed remedies for the 'Jewish problem' – the seemingly endless cycle of anti-Jewish persecution – all shaped by their worldviews. As patriots, Churchill and Chesterton embraced Zionism; both were among the first to defend the Jews from Nazism", concluding that "A defender of Jews in his youth – a conciliator as well as a defender – GKC returned to the defence when the Jewish people needed it most."[94] Opposition to eugenics[edit] In Eugenics and Other Evils, Chesterton attacked eugenics as Parliament was moving towards passage of the Mental Deficiency Act 1913. Some backing the ideas of eugenics called for the government to sterilise people deemed "mentally defective"; this view did not gain popularity but the idea of segregating them from the rest of society and thereby preventing them from reproducing did gain traction. These ideas disgusted Chesterton who wrote, "It is not only openly said, it is eagerly urged that the aim of the measure is to prevent any person whom these propagandists do not happen to think intelligent from having any wife or children."[95] He condemned the proposed wording for such measures as being so vague as to apply to anyone, including "Every tramp who is sulk, every labourer who is shy, every rustic who is eccentric, can quite easily be brought under such conditions as were designed for homicidal maniacs. That is the situation; and that is the point ... we are already under the Eugenist State; and nothing remains to us but rebellion."[95] He derided such ideas as founded on nonsense, "as if one had a right to dragoon and enslave one's fellow citizens as a kind of chemical experiment".[95] Chesterton mocked the idea that poverty was a result of bad breeding: "[it is a] strange new disposition to regard the poor as a race; as if they were a colony of Japs or Chinese coolies ... The poor are not a race or even a type. It is senseless to talk about breeding them; for they are not a breed. They are, in cold fact, what Dickens describes: 'a dustbin of individual accidents,' of damaged dignity, and often of damaged gentility."[95][96] Chesterton's fence[edit] "Chesterton's fence" is the principle that reforms should not be made until the reasoning behind the existing state of affairs is understood. The quotation is from Chesterton's 1929 book, The Thing: Why I Am a Catholic, in the chapter, "The Drift from Domesticity": In the matter of reforming things, as distinct from deforming them, there is one plain and simple principle; a principle which will probably be called a paradox. There exists in such a case a certain institution or law; let us say, for the sake of simplicity, a fence or gate erected across a road. The more modern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, 'I don't see the use of this; let us clear it away.' To which the more intelligent type of reformer will do well to answer: 'If you don't see the use of it, I certainly won't let you clear it away. Go away and think. Then, when you can come back and tell me that you do see the use of it, I may allow you to destroy it.'[97] Distributism[edit] Self-portrait based on the distributist slogan "Three acres and a cow" Inspired by Leo XIII's encyclical Rerum novarum, Chesterton's brother Cecil and his friend, Hilaire Belloc were instrumental in developing the economic philosophy of distributism, a word Belloc coined. Gilbert embraced their views and, particularly after Cecil's death in World War I, became one of the foremost distributists and the newspaper whose care he inherited from Cecil, which ultimately came to be named G. K.'s Weekly, became its most consistent advocate. Distributism stands as a third way, against both unrestrained capitalism, and socialism, advocating a wide distribution of both property and political power. Scottish and Irish Nationalism[edit] Despite his criticisms of Nazism, Chesterton was not an opponent of nationalism in general and gave a degree of support to the Scottish and Irish home rule movements. He endorsed Cunninghame Graham and Compton Mackenzie for the post of Lord Rector of Glasgow University in 1928 and 1931 respectively, had praised Scottish Catholics as "patriots" contra the Anglophilia of John Knox.[98] Chesterton was also a supporter of Irish home rule and maintained friendships with members of the Irish Parliamentary Party. This was in part due to his belief that Irish Catholics had a naturally distributist outlook on property ownership.[99] Legacy[edit] James Parker, in The Atlantic, gave a modern appraisal: In his vastness and mobility, Chesterton continues to elude definition: He was a Catholic convert and an oracular man of letters, a pneumatic cultural presence, an aphorist with the production rate of a pulp novelist. Poetry, criticism, fiction, biography, columns, public debate...Chesterton was a journalist; he was a metaphysician. He was a reactionary; he was a radical. He was a modernist, acutely alive to the rupture in consciousness that produced Eliot's "The Hollow Men"; he was an anti-modernist...a parochial Englishman and a post-Victorian gasbag; he was a mystic wedded to eternity. All of these cheerfully contradictory things are true...for the final, resolving fact that he was a genius. Touched once by the live wire of his thought, you don't forget it ... His prose ... [is] supremely entertaining, the stately outlines of an older, heavier rhetoric punctually convulsed by what he once called (in reference to the Book of Job) "earthquake irony". He fulminates wittily; he cracks jokes like thunder. His message, a steady illumination beaming and clanging through every lens and facet of his creativity, was really very straightforward: get on your knees, modern man, and praise God.[100] Possible sainthood[edit] The Bishop Emeritus of Northampton, Peter Doyle, in 2012 had opened a preliminary investigation into possibly launching a cause for beatification and then canonization (for possible sainthood). but eventually decided not to open the cause. The current Bishop of Northampton, David Oakley, has agreed to preach at a Mass during a Chesterton pilgrimage in England (the route goes through London and Beaconsfield, which are both connected to his life), and some have speculated he may be more favourable to the idea. If the cause is actually opened at the diocesan level (the Vatican must also give approval, that nothing stands in the way – the "nihil obstat"), then he could be given the title "Servant of God". It is not known if his alleged anti-Semitism (which would be considered a serious matter by the Church if it is true) may have played a role. His life and writings and views and what he did for others would be closely examined, in any case.[101] Literary[edit] Chesterton's socio-economic system of Distributism affected the sculptor Eric Gill, who established a commune of Catholic artists at Ditchling in Sussex. The Ditchling group developed a journal called The Game, in which they expressed many Chestertonian principles, particularly anti-industrialism and an advocacy of religious family life.[citation needed] His novel The Man Who Was Thursday inspired the Irish Republican leader Michael Collins with the idea that "If you didn't seem to be hiding nobody hunted you out."[102] Collins's favourite work of Chesterton was The Napoleon of Notting Hill, and he was "almost fanatically attached to it", according to his friend Sir William Darling.[103] His column in The Illustrated London News on 18 September 1909 had a profound effect on Mahatma Gandhi.[104] P. N. Furbank asserts that Gandhi was "thunderstruck" when he read it,[105] while Martin Green notes that "Gandhi was so delighted with this that he told Indian Opinion to reprint it".[106] Another convert was Canadian media theorist Marshall McLuhan, who said that the book What's Wrong with the World changed his life in terms of ideas and religion.[107] The author Neil Gaiman stated that he grew up reading Chesterton in his school's library, and that The Napoleon of Notting Hill influenced his own book Neverwhere. Gaiman based the character Gilbert from the comic book The Sandman on Chesterton,[108] and Good Omens, the novel Gaiman co-wrote with Terry Pratchett, is dedicated to Chesterton. The Argentine author and essayist Jorge Luis Borges cited Chesterton as influential on his fiction, telling interviewer Richard Burgin that "Chesterton knew how to make the most of a detective story".[109] Education[edit] Chesterton's many references to education and human formation have inspired a variety of educators including the 69 schools of the Chesterton Schools Network,[110] which includes the Chesterton Academy founded by Dale Ahlquist.[111] and the Italian Scuola Libera G. K. Chesterton in San Benedetto del Tronto, Marche.[112] The publisher and educator Christopher Perrin (who completed his doctoral work on Chesterton) makes frequent reference to Chesterton in his work with classical schools.[113] Namesakes[edit] In 1974, Ian Boyd, founded The Chesterton Review, a scholarly journal devoted to Chesterton and his circle. The journal is published by the G. K. Chesterton Institute for Faith and Culture based in Seton Hall University, South Orange, New Jersey.[114] In 1996, Dale Ahlquist founded the American Chesterton Society to explore and promote Chesterton's writings.[115] In 2008, a Catholic high school, Chesterton Academy, opened in the Minneapolis area. In the same year Scuola Libera Chesterton opened in San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy.[116] In 2012, a crater on the planet Mercury was named Chesterton after the author.[117] In 2014, G. K. Chesterton Academy of Chicago, a Catholic high school, opened in Highland Park, Illinois.[118] A fictionalised G. K. Chesterton is the central character in the Young Chesterton Chronicles, a series of young adult adventure novels by John McNichol,[119][120] and in the G K Chesterton Mystery series, a series of detective novels by the Australian author Kel Richards.[121] Major works[edit] Main article: G. K. Chesterton bibliography Books[edit] Library resources about G. K. Chesterton Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By G. K. Chesterton Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Chesterton, Gilbert Keith (1904), Ward, M. (ed.), The Napoleon of Notting Hill ——— (1903), Robert Browning, Macmillan[122] ——— (1905), Heretics, John Lane ——— (1906), Charles Dickens: A Critical Study, Dodd, Mead & Co., p. 299 ——— (1908a), The Man Who Was Thursday ——— (1908b), Orthodoxy ——— (1911a), The Innocence of Father Brown ——— (1911b), The Ballad of the White Horse ——— (1912), Manalive ——— (1916), The Crimes of England ———, Father Brown (short stories) (detective fiction) ——— (1920), Ward, M. (ed.), The New Jerusalem, archived from the original on 15 January 2017 ——— (1922), The Man Who Knew Too Much, Simon & Brown, ISBN 1731700563 ——— (1922), Eugenics and Other Evils  ——— (1923), Saint Francis of Assisi ——— (1925), The Everlasting Man ——— (1925), William Cobbett ——— (1933), Saint Thomas Aquinas ——— (1935), The Well and the Shallows ——— (1936), The Autobiography ——— (1950), Ward, M. (ed.), The Common Man, archived from the original on 15 January 2017 Short stories[edit] "The Trees of Pride", 1922 "The Crime of the Communist", Collier's Weekly, July 1934. "The Three Horsemen", Collier's Weekly, April 1935. "The Ring of the Lovers", Collier's Weekly, April 1935. "A Tall Story", Collier's Weekly, April 1935. "The Angry Street – A Bad Dream", Famous Fantastic Mysteries, February 1947. Plays[edit] Magic, 1913. References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ Ker, Ian (2003). The Catholic Revival in English Literature (1845–1961): Newman, Hopkins, Belloc, Chesterton, Greene, Waugh. University of Notre Dame Press. ^ "Obituary", Variety, 17 June 1936 ^ a b O'Connor, John (1937). Father Brown on Chesterton (PDF). Frederick Muller Ltd. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 April 2013. Retrieved 7 April 2013. ^ a b "Orthodoxologist", Time, 11 October 1943, archived from the original on 20 November 2009, retrieved 24 October 2008 ^ Douglas 1974: "Like his friend Ronald Knox he was both entertainer and Christian apologist. The world never fails to appreciate the combination when it is well done; even evangelicals sometimes give the impression of bestowing a waiver on deviations if a man is enough of a genius." ^ Ker 2011, p. 485. ^ Douglas, J. D. (24 May 1974). "G. K. Chesterton, the Eccentric Prince of Paradox". Christianity Today. Archived from the original on 1 November 2014. Retrieved 8 July 2014. ^ Chesterton, Gilbert Keith (2002). Čovjek koji je previše znao (in Croatian). Translated by Darko Mitin. Zlatar: Partenon. p. 134. ISBN 953-6840-03-0. ^ Bergonzi, Bernard (2004). "Chesterton, Gilbert Keith [G. K. C.] (1874–1936), writer". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/32392. ISBN 978-0-19-861412-8. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) ^ Simkin, John. "G. K. Chesterton". Spartacus Educational. Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015. ^ Haushalter, Walter M. (1912), "Gilbert Keith Chesterton", The University Magazine, vol. XI, p. 236 – via Internet Archive ^ Ker 2011, p. 1. ^ Ker 2011, p. 13. ^ Chesterton 1936, Chapter IV. ^ Ker 2011, p. 265–266. ^ Chesterton and the child – A Collection of Papers presented at a conference of the Australian Chesterton Society on October 20, 2018, at Campion College Australia, Sydney (PDF). Sydney, Australia: Australian Chesterton Society. 2018. p. 41. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 August 2019. Retrieved 13 November 2019. ^ Ker 2011, p. 162–163. ^ a b Ker 2011, p. 41. ^ Chesterton, G. K. (1911), "The Flying Stars", The Innocence of Father Brown, London: Cassell & Company, Ltd., p. 118 ^ Do We agree? A Debate between G. K. Chesterton and Bernard Shaw, with Hilaire Belloc in the Chair, London: C. Palmer, 1928 ^ "Clarence Darrow debate". American Chesterton Society. 30 April 2012. Archived from the original on 21 May 2014. Retrieved 21 May 2014. ^ "G. K. Chesterton January, 1915". Clarence Darrow digital collection. University of Minnesota Law School. Archived from the original on 21 May 2014. Retrieved 21 May 2014. ^ Chesterton 1936, pp. 231–235. ^ Programme, The Trial of John Jasper for the Murder of Edwin Drood, at King's Hall, Covent Garden, 7 January 1914. (A copy in a private collection, annotated by the original owner.) ^ Wilson, A. N. (1984), Hilaire Belloc, London: Hamish Hamilton, p. 219 ^ Cornelius, Judson K. Literary Humour. Mumbai: St Paul's Books. p. 144. ISBN 978-81-7108-374-9. ^ Wodehouse, P.G. (1972), The World of Mr. Mulliner, Barrie and Jenkins, p. 172 ^ Ward 1944, chapter XV. ^ Chesterton 1936, Chapter 16. ^ Ker 2011, p. 675. ^ a b "Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874–1936)". Catholic Authors. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 23 March 2011. ^ Nomination archive – Gilbert K Chesterton nobelprize.org ^ "Detection Club, The". Gadetection / Detection Club, The, gadetection.pbworks.com/w/page/7930445/Detection%20Club%2C%20The. ^ Lauer, Quentin (1991), G. K. Chesterton: Philosopher Without Portfolio, New York City, NY: Fordham University Press, p. 25 ^ Barker, Dudley (1973), G. K. Chesterton: A Biography, New York: Stein and Day, p. 287 ^ Gaspari, Antonio (14 July 2009). "'Blessed' G. K. Chesterton?: Interview on Possible Beatification of English Author". Zenit: The World Seen from Rome. Rome. Archived from the original on 15 June 2010. Retrieved 18 October 2010. ^ Bridges, Horace J. (1914). "G. K. Chesterton as Theologian". In: Ethical Addresses. Philadelphia: The American Ethical Union, pp. 21–44. ^ Caldecott, Stratford (1999). "Was G. K. Chesterton a Theologian?", The Chesterton Review. (Rep. by CERC: Catholic Education Research Center Archived 13 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine.) ^ Ahlquist, Dale (2006). Common Sense 101: Lessons from G. K. Chesterton. Ignatius Press. p. 286. ^ Douglas, J. D. "G. K. Chesterton, the Eccentric Prince of Paradox", Archived 20 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine Christianity Today, 8 January 2001. ^ Gray, Robert. "Paradox Was His Doxy", Archived 10 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine The American Conservative, 23 March 2009. ^ a b Eliot, T. S. (20 June 1936). "Gilbert Chesterton by T. S. Eliot". The Tablet. 167 (5015): 785. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 19 April 2020. ^ Hasnes, Geir (2022). G. K. Chesterton. A Bibliography. Kongsberg, Norway: Classica forlag. ISBN 978-82-7610-013-6. ^ Mccarthy, John P. (1982). "The Historical Vision of Chesterbelloc", Modern Age, Vol. XXVI, No. 2, pp. 175–182. ^ McInerny, Ralph. "Chesterbelloc", Archived 29 April 2013 at the Wayback Machine Catholic Dossier, May/June 1998. ^ Shaw, George Bernard (1918). "Belloc and Chesterton", Archived 11 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine The New Age, South Africa Vol. II, No. 16, pp. 309–311. ^ Lynd, Robert (1919). "Mr. G. K. Chesterton and Mr. Hilaire Belloc". In: Old and New Masters. London: T. Fisher Unwin Ltd., pp. 25–41. ^ McInerny, Ralph. "The Chesterbelloc Thing" Archived 29 December 2012 at the Wayback Machine, The Catholic Thing, 30 September 2008. ^ Wells, H. G. (1908). "About Chesterton and Belloc", Archived 11 September 2006 at the Wayback Machine The New Age, South Africa Vol. II, No. 11, pp. 209–210 (Rep. in Social Forces in England and America, 1914). ^ "Belloc and the Distributists", The American Review, November 1933. ^ Belloc, Hilaire (1940). On the Place of Chesterton in English Letters. London: Sheed & Ward. Archived from the original on 17 February 2020. Retrieved 19 April 2020. ^ Chesterton 1905, chapter 7. ^ "Misguided Superman Fan: George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950)". Christian History Institute. ^ Chesterton 1905, chapter 4. ^ Chesterton 1905, chapter 20. ^ Vanauken, S., A Severe Mercy (New York: Harper & Row, 1977), p. 90. ^ Letter to Sheldon Vanauken, Archived 3 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine 14 December 1950. ^ Lewis, Clive Staples, The Collected Letters, vol. 2, p. 823 ^ The Christian Century, 6 June 1962 ^ Routley, Erik (2005). An English-speaking Hymnal Guide. GIA publications. p. 129. ^ Edmondson, Jacqueline, ed. (2013). Music in American Life: An Encyclopedia of the Songs, Styles, Stars, and Stories That Shaped Our Culture. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood. p. 39. ^ "Bruce Dickinson: Faith And Music (1999)". Archived from the original on 18 February 2017. Retrieved 11 September 2017 – via YouTube. ^ Gilson, Etienne (1987), "Letter to Chesterton's editor", in Pieper, Josef (ed.), Guide to Thomas Aquinas, University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 6–7 ^ Sheen, Fulton J. (2008). Treasure in Clay. New York: Image Books/Doubleday, p. 79. ^ Sheen, Fulton J. God and Intelligence. IVE Press. ^ Ahlquist, Dale (2003). G. K. Chesterton: The Apostle of Common Sense. San Francisco: Ignatius Press. ^ Chesterton 1908b, chapter 3. ^ Holroyd, Michael (1989). Bernard Shaw Vol 2. London: Chatto & Windus. p. 214. ISBN 978-0701133504. ^ Fawcett, Edmund (2020). Conservatism: The Fight for a Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 252. ISBN 978-0-691-17410-5. ^ Kirk, Russell (2019). Russell Kirk's Concise Guide to Conservatism. Washington: Regnery Publishing. p. 4. ISBN 978-1-62157-878-9. ^ Hamilton, Andy (2020), "Conservatism", in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab: Stanford University, retrieved 26 November 2023 ^ Ahlquist, Dale (March 2021). "Remembering G. K. Chesterton". Chronicles. Retrieved 26 November 2023. ^ Ffinch, Michael (1986). G. K. Chesterton: A Biography. New York: Harper and Row. p. 228–29. ISBN 0-06-252576-X. ^ Chesterton, Gilbert Keith (1914). The Barbarism of Berlin. London: Cassell and Company. ^ Chesterton, Gilbert Keith (1915). The Crimes of England. London: C. Palmer & Hayward. ^ Chesterton, G. K. (1920) The New Jerusalem, Hodder and Stoughton, chapter 13. ^ "Last orders", The Guardian, 9 April 2005, archived from the original on 27 August 2006, retrieved 2 July 2006 ^ Chesterton, Gilbert. G. K. Chesterton to the Editor. The Nation, 18 March 1911. ^ a b c d e f g Mayers, Simon (2013). Chesterton's Jews: Stereotypes and Caricatures in the Literature and Journalism of G. K. Chesterton. Simon Mayers. pp. 85–87. ISBN 9781490392462. Archived from the original on 29 May 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2020. ^ Gardner, Martin (1989). "Introduction". Four Faultless Felons. Dover Publications. ^ Donaldson, Frances (2011). The Marconi Scandal. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 51. ISBN 978-1448205547. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 24 October 2016. ^ Endelman, Todd M. (2002). The Jews of Britain, 1656 to 2000. University of California Press. p. 155. ISBN 9780520227194. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2017. ^ Julius, Anthony (2010), Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism in England, Oxford University Press, p. 422 ^ Chesterton, G. K. (1917), A Short History of England, Chatto and Windus, pp. 108–109 ^ Chesterton 1920, Chapter 13. ^ a b Chesterton 1920, Chapter 13. ^ Pearce, Joseph (2005). Literary Giants, Literary Catholics. San Francisco: Ignatius Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-1-58617-077-6. ^ Ward 1944, p. 265. ^ The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton Archived 1 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine, Volume 5, Ignatius Press, 1987, page 593 ^ Chesterton, G. K. (2007). The Everlasting Man. Mineola, NY: Dover publications. p. 117. ^ "Was G. K. Chesterton Anti-Semitic?", Archived 29 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine by Dale Ahlquist. ^ Ann Farmer, Chesterton and the Jews: Friend, Critic, Defender (Angelico Press, 2015) ^ Ahlquist, Dale. "Defending the Defender of the Jews". www.catholicworldreport.com. Archived from the original on 10 April 2021. ^ "The debate: Was Chesterton an anti-Semite?". 28 August 2019. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. ^ a b c d Chesterton, Gilbert Keith (1922). Eugenics and Other Evils. London, UK: Cassell and Company. ^ "The Enemy of Eugenics" Archived 23 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, by Russell Sparkes. ^ Chesterton, G. K. (1929). "The Drift from Domesticity". Archived 6 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine In: The Thing. London: Sheed & Ward, p. 35. ^ Brand, Jack (1978). The National movement in Scotland. London Henley Boston: Routledge and K. Paul. ISBN 978-0-7100-8866-6. ^ Davenport, John (2014). "G. K. Chesterton: Nationalist Ireland's English Apologist". Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review. 103 (410): 178–192. ISSN 0039-3495. ^ Parker, James (April 2015). "A Most Unlikely Saint: The case for canonizing G. K. Chesterton, the bombastic man of letters and paradoxical militant for God". The Atlantic (15 April Issue). Archived from the original on 17 May 2020. Retrieved 19 April 2020. ^ "A pilgrimage in England traces G. K. Chesterton's path in hope of his beatification". ^ Forester, Margery (2006). Michael Collins – The Lost Leader, Gill & MacMillan, p. 35. ^ Mackay, James (1996). Michael Collins: A Life. London, England: Mainstream Publishing. p. Chapter 2. ^ Gandhi, Rajmohan (2007). Gandhi: The Man, His People, and the Empire. Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 139–141. ^ Furbank, P. N. (1974), "Chesterton the Edwardian", in Sullivan, John (ed.), G. K. Chesterton: A Centenary Appraisal, Harper and Row ^ Green, Martin B. (2009), Gandhi: Voice of a New Age Revolution, Axios, p. 266 ^ Marchand, Philip (1998). Marshall McLuhan: The Medium and the Messenger: A Biography. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 28–30. ^ Bender, Hy (2000). The Sandman Companion: A Dreamer's Guide to the Award-Winning Comic Series DC Comics, ISBN 1-56389-644-3. ^ Burgin, Richard (1969). Conversations with Jorge Luis Borges. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, p. 35. ^ Kenney, Nora (14 February 2024). "An Atmosphere of Joy". City Journal. ^ "Our Network Schools". Chesterton Schools Network. Retrieved 23 December 2022. ^ "Scuola | Scuola Chesterton | San Benedetto Del Tronto". Scuola Chesterton. ^ "The Teacher as Muse". Virtue (from the Great Hearts Institute). Retrieved 23 December 2022. ^ "The Chesterton Review". Philosophy Documentation Center. Archived from the original on 12 May 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2021. ^ "Society of Gilbert Keith Chesterton – Apostolate of Common Sense". Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 13 November 2019. ^ "Scuola Libera G. K. Chesterton". Chesterton Schools Network. 16 April 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2021. ^ "Chesterton", Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature, United States: Geological Survey, 17 September 2012, archived from the original on 18 February 2013, retrieved 18 September 2012 ^ School built around G. K. Chesterton to open in Highland Park, United States Chicago: highlandpark suntimes, 19 March 2014, archived from the original on 25 May 2014, retrieved 25 May 2014 ^ McNichol, John (2017). The Tripods Attack!: The Young Chesterton Chronicles Book 1. Hillside Education. ISBN 978-0-9991706-0-1. ^ McNichol, John (2021). The Emperor of North America: Volume 2 of Young Chesterton Chronicles. Hillside Education. ISBN 978-1-7331383-4-5. ^ Richards, Kel (2002). Murder in the Mummy's Tomb: A G. K. Chesterton Mystery. RiverOak Pub. ISBN 978-1589199637. ^ "Review of Robert Browning by G. K. Chesterton". The Athenaeum (3946): 744–746. 13 June 1903. Sources[edit] Cited biographies Barker, Dudley (1973), G. K. Chesterton: A Biography, London, England: Constable, ISBN 978-0-09-457830-2 Ker, Ian (2011), G. K. Chesterton: A Biography, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-960128-8 Pearce, Joseph (1996), Wisdom and Innocence: A Life of G. K. Chesterton, London, England: Hodder and Stoughton, ISBN 978-0-34-067132-0 Ward, Maisie (1944), Gilbert Keith Chesterton, Sheed & Ward Further reading[edit] Ahlquist, Dale (2012), The Complete Thinker: The Marvelous Mind of G. K. Chesterton, Ignatius Press, ISBN 978-1-58617-675-4 ——— (2003), G. K. Chesterton: Apostle of Common Sense, Ignatius Press, ISBN 978-0-89870-857-8 Belmonte, Kevin (2011). Defiant Joy: The Remarkable Life and Impact of G. K. Chesterton. Nashville, Tenn.: Thomas Nelson. Blackstock, Alan R. (2012). The Rhetoric of Redemption: Chesterton, Ethical Criticism, and the Common Man. New York. Peter Lang Publishing. Braybrooke, Patrick (1922). Gilbert Keith Chesterton. London: Chelsea Publishing Company. Cammaerts, Émile (1937). The Laughing Prophet: The Seven Virtues nd G. K. Chesterton. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd. Campbell, W. E. (1908). "G. K. Chesterton: Inquisitor and Democrat", Archived 6 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine The Catholic World, Vol. LXXXVIII, pp. 769–782. Campbell, W. E. (1909). "G. K. Chesterton: Catholic Apologist" The Catholic World, Vol. LXXXIX, No. 529, pp. 1–12. Chesterton, Cecil (1908). G. K. Chesterton: A Criticism. London: Alston Rivers (Rep. by John Lane Company, 1909). Clipper, Lawrence J. (1974). G. K. Chesterton. New York: Twayne Publishers. Coates, John (1984). Chesterton and the Edwardian Cultural Crisis. Hull University Press. Coates, John (2002). G. K. Chesterton as Controversialist, Essayist, Novelist, and Critic. Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press. Conlon, D. J. (1987). G. K. Chesterton: A Half Century of Views. Oxford University Press. Cooney, A (1999), G. K. Chesterton, One Sword at Least, London: Third Way, ISBN 978-0-9535077-1-9 Coren, Michael (2001) [1989], Gilbert: The Man who was G. K. Chesterton, Vancouver: Regent College Publishing, ISBN 9781573831956, OCLC 45190713 Corrin, Jay P. (1981). G. K. Chesterton & Hilaire Belloc: The Battle Against Modernity. Ohio University Press. Ervine, St. John G. (1922). "G. K. Chesterton". In: Some Impressions of my Elders. New York: The Macmillan Company, pp. 90–112. Ffinch, Michael (1986), G. K. Chesterton, Harper & Row Gilbert Magazine (November/December 2008). Vol. 12, No. 2-3, Special Issue: Chesterton & The Jews. Haldane, John. 'Chesterton's Philosophy of Education', philosophy, Vol. 65, No. 251 (Jan. 1990), pp. 65–80. Hitchens, Christopher (2012). "The Reactionary", Archived 10 December 2016 at the Wayback Machine The Atlantic. Herts, B. Russell (1914). "Gilbert K. Chesterton: Defender of the Discarded". In: Depreciations. New York: Albert & Charles Boni, pp. 65–86. Hollis, Christopher (1970). The Mind of Chesterton. London: Hollis & Carter. Hunter, Lynette (1979). G. K. Chesterton: Explorations in Allegory. London: Macmillan Press. Jaki, Stanley (1986). Chesterton: A Seer of Science. University of Illinois Press. Jaki, Stanley (1986). "Chesterton's Landmark Year". In: Chance or Reality and Other Essays. University Press of America. Kenner, Hugh (1947). Paradox in Chesterton. New York: Sheed & Ward. Kimball, Roger (2011). "G. K. Chesterton: Master of Rejuvenation", Archived 27 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine The New Criterion, Vol. XXX, p. 26. Kirk, Russell (1971). "Chesterton, Madmen, and Madhouses", Modern Age, Vol. XV, No. 1, pp. 6–16. Knight, Mark (2004). Chesterton and Evil. Fordham University Press. Lea, F. A. (1947). "G. K. Chesterton". In: Donald Attwater (ed.) Modern Christian Revolutionaries. New York: Devin-Adair Co. McCleary, Joseph R. (2009). The Historical Imagination of G. K. Chesterton: Locality, Patriotism, and Nationalism. Taylor & Francis. McLuhan, Marshall (January 1936), "G. K. Chesterton: A Practical Mystic", Archived 29 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine Dalhousie Review, 15 (4): 455–464. McNichol, J. (2008), The Young Chesterton Chronicles, vol. Book One: The Tripods Attack!, Manchester, NH: Sophia Institute, ISBN 978-1-933184-26-5 Oddie, William (2010). Chesterton and the Romance of Orthodoxy: The Making of GKC, 1874–1908. Oxford University Press. Orage, Alfred Richard. (1922). "G. K. Chesterton on Rome and Germany". In: Readers and Writers (1917–1921). London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 155–161. Oser, Lee (2007). The Return of Christian Humanism: Chesterton, Eliot, Tolkien, and the Romance of History. University of Missouri Press. Paine, Randall (1999), The Universe and Mr. Chesterton, Sherwood Sugden, ISBN 978-0-89385-511-6 Pearce, Joseph (1997), Wisdom and Innocence – A Life of G. K. Chesterton, Ignatius Press, ISBN 978-0-89870-700-7 Peck, William George (1920). "Mr. G. K. Chesterton and the Return to Sanity". In: From Chaos to Catholicism. London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 52–92. Raymond, E. T. (1919). "Mr. G. K. Chesterton". In: All & Sundry. London: T. Fisher Unwin, pp. 68–76. Schall, James V. (2000). Schall on Chesterton: Timely Essays on Timeless Paradoxes. Catholic University of America Press. Scott, William T. (1912). Chesterton and Other Essays. Cincinnati: Jennings & Graham. Seaber, Luke (2011). G. K. Chesterton's Literary Influence on George Orwell: A Surprising Irony. Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press. Sheed, Wilfrid (1971). "Chesterbelloc and the Jews", The New York Review of Books, Vol. XVII, No. 3. Shuster, Norman (1922). "The Adventures of a Journalist: G. K. Chesterton". In: The Catholic Spirit in Modern English Literature. New York: The Macmillan Company, pp. 229–248. Slosson, Edwin E. (1917). "G. K. Chesterton: Knight Errant of Orthodoxy". In: Six Major Prophets. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 129–189. Smith, Marion Couthouy (1921). "The Rightness of G. K. Chesterton", The Catholic World, Vol. CXIII, No. 678, pp. 163–168. Stapleton, Julia (2009). Christianity, Patriotism, and Nationhood: The England of G. K. Chesterton. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Sullivan, John (1974), G. K. Chesterton: A Centenary Appraisal, London: Paul Elek, ISBN 978-0-236-17628-1 Tonquédec, Joseph de (1920). G. K. Chesterton, ses Idées et son Caractère, Nouvelle Librairie National. Ward, Maisie (1952). Return to Chesterton, London: Sheed & Ward. West, Julius (1915). G. K. Chesterton: A Critical Study. London: Martin Secker. Williams, Donald T (2006), Mere Humanity: G. K. Chesterton, C. S. Lewis, and J. R. R. Tolkien on the Human Condition External links[edit] G. K. Chesterton at Wikipedia's sister projects Media from CommonsQuotations from WikiquoteTexts from WikisourceData from Wikidata Works by G. K. Chesterton in eBook form at Standard Ebooks Works by G. K. Chesterton at Project Gutenberg Works by G. K. (Gilbert Keith) Chesterton at Faded Page (Canada) Works by or about G. K. Chesterton at Internet Archive Works by G. K. Chesterton at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) G. K. Chesterton at Curlie Works by G. K. Chesterton, at HathiTrust "Archival material relating to G. K. Chesterton". UK National Archives. What's Wrong: GKC in Periodicals Articles by G. K. Chesterton in periodicals, with critical annotations. The American Chesterton Society, retrieved 28 October 2010. G. K. Chesterton: Quotidiana G. K. Chesterton research collection at The Marion E. Wade Center at Wheaton College G. K. Chesterton Archival Collection at the University of St. Michael's College at the University of Toronto Newspaper clippings about G. K. Chesterton in the 20th Century Press Archives of the ZBW Scuola Libera G. K. Chesterton, retrieved 3 September 2023 Società Chestertoniana Italiana, retrieved 3 September 2023 vteG. K. ChestertonBibliographyPoetry The Ballad of the White Horse (1911) "The Rolling English Road" (1913) "A Ballade of Suicide" (1915) "Lepanto" (1915) Novels The Napoleon of Notting Hill (1904) The Man Who Was Thursday (1908) The Ball and the Cross (1909) Manalive (1912) The Flying Inn (1914) Short stories The Club of Queer Trades (1905) "The Blue Cross" (1910) "The Hammer of God" (1911) The Man Who Knew Too Much (1922) The Incredulity of Father Brown (1926) The Poet and the Lunatics (1929) The Paradoxes of Mr. Pond (1936) Non-fiction Heretics (1905) Orthodoxy (1908) The New Jerusalem (1920) Fancies Versus Fads (1923) The Everlasting Man (1925) Adaptations Father Brown, Detective (1934) The Adventures of Father Brown (1945) Father Brown (1954) The Black Sheep (1960) He Can't Stop Doing It (1962) Father Brown (1966–1972) Father Brown (1974) Pfarrer Braun (2003–2014) Father Brown (2013–present) list of episodes Sister Boniface Mysteries (2022–present) Others Father Brown Flambeau G. K.'s Weekly Magic Related Frances Blogg (wife) Cecil Chesterton (brother) The Chesterton Review Chesterton Academy vteHistory of Catholic theologyKey figuresGeneral History of the Catholic Church Timeline History of the papacy Papal primacy Ecumenical councils Catholic Bible Vulgate Biblical canon History of Christian theology Early Church Paul Clement of Rome First Epistle of Clement Didache Ignatius of Antioch Polycarp Epistle of Barnabas The Shepherd of Hermas Aristides of Athens Justin Martyr Epistle to Diognetus Irenaeus Montanism Tertullian Origen Antipope Novatian Cyprian Constantine toPope Gregory I Eusebius Athanasius of Alexandria Arianism Pelagianism Nestorianism Monophysitism Ephrem the Syrian Hilary of Poitiers Cyril of Jerusalem Basil of Caesarea Gregory of Nazianzus Gregory of Nyssa Ambrose John Chrysostom Jerome Augustine of Hippo John Cassian Orosius Cyril of Alexandria Peter Chrysologus Pope Leo I Boethius Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite Pope Gregory I Early Middle Ages Isidore of Seville John Climacus Maximus the Confessor Monothelitism Ecthesis Bede John of Damascus Iconoclasm Transubstantiation dispute Predestination disputes Paulinus II of Aquileia Alcuin Benedict of Aniane Rabanus Maurus Paschasius Radbertus John Scotus Eriugena High Middle Ages Roscellinus Gregory of Narek Berengar of Tours Peter Damian Anselm of Canterbury Joachim of Fiore Peter Abelard Decretum Gratiani Bernard of Clairvaux Peter Lombard Anselm of Laon Hildegard of Bingen Hugh of Saint Victor Dominic de Guzmán Robert Grosseteste Francis of Assisi Anthony of Padua Beatrice of Nazareth Bonaventure Albertus Magnus Boetius of Dacia Henry of Ghent Thomas Aquinas Siger of Brabant Thomism Roger Bacon Mysticism and reforms Ramon Llull Duns Scotus Dante Alighieri William of Ockham Richard Rolle John of Ruusbroec Catherine of Siena Bridget of Sweden Meister Eckhart Johannes Tauler Walter Hilton The Cloud of Unknowing Heinrich Seuse Geert Groote Devotio Moderna Julian of Norwich Thomas à Kempis Nicholas of Cusa Marsilio Ficino Girolamo Savonarola Giovanni Pico della Mirandola ReformationCounter-Reformation Erasmus Thomas Cajetan Thomas More John Fisher Johann Eck Francisco de Vitoria Thomas of Villanova Ignatius of Loyola Francisco de Osuna John of Ávila Francis Xavier Teresa of Ávila Luis de León John of the Cross Peter Canisius Luis de Molina (Molinism) Robert Bellarmine Francisco Suárez Lawrence of Brindisi Francis de Sales Baroque period toFrench Revolution Tommaso Campanella Pierre de Bérulle Pierre Gassendi René Descartes Mary of Jesus of Ágreda António Vieira Jean-Jacques Olier Louis Thomassin Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet François Fénelon Cornelius Jansen (Jansenism) Blaise Pascal Nicolas Malebranche Giambattista Vico Alphonsus Liguori Louis de Montfort Maria Gaetana Agnesi Alfonso Muzzarelli Johann Michael Sailer Clement Mary Hofbauer Bruno Lanteri 19th century Joseph Görres Félicité de La Mennais Luigi Taparelli Antonio Rosmini Ignaz von Döllinger John Henry Newman Henri Lacordaire Jaime Balmes Gaetano Sanseverino Giovanni Maria Cornoldi Wilhelm Emmanuel Freiherr von Ketteler Giuseppe Pecci Joseph Hergenröther Tommaso Maria Zigliara Matthias Joseph Scheeben Émile Boutroux Modernism Neo-scholasticism Léon Bloy Désiré-Joseph Mercier Friedrich von Hügel Vladimir Solovyov Marie-Joseph Lagrange George Tyrrell Maurice Blondel Thérèse of Lisieux 20th century G. K. Chesterton Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Joseph Maréchal Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Jacques Maritain Étienne Gilson Ronald Knox Georges Bernanos Dietrich von Hildebrand Gabriel Marcel Marie-Dominique Chenu Romano Guardini Edith Stein Fulton Sheen Henri de Lubac Dorothy Day Henri Daniel-Rops Jean Guitton Josemaría Escrivá Nouvelle théologie Karl Rahner Yves Congar Bernard Lonergan Emmanuel Mounier Jean Daniélou Hans Urs von Balthasar Marcel Lefebvre Frederick Copleston Alfred Delp Thomas Merton René Girard Johann Baptist Metz Jean Vanier Henri Nouwen 21st century Pope John Paul II Alice von Hildebrand Carlo Maria Martini Pope Benedict XVI Gustavo Gutiérrez Alasdair MacIntyre Walter Kasper Raniero Cantalamessa Michał Heller Peter Kreeft Jean-Luc Marion Tomáš Halík Aidan Nichols Scott Hahn  Catholicism portal Authority control databases International FAST ISNI VIAF National Norway Chile Spain France BnF data Argentina Catalonia Germany Italy Israel Finland Belgium United States Sweden Latvia Japan Czech Republic Australia Greece Korea Croatia Netherlands Poland Portugal Vatican Academics CiNii Artists MusicBrainz 2 RKD Artists ULAN People Deutsche Biographie Trove Other RISM SNAC IdRef
Much has been said, and said truly, of the monkish morbidity, of the hysteria which as often gone with the visions of hermits or nuns. But let us never forget that this visionary religion is, in one sense, necessarily more wholesome than our modern and reasonable morality. It is more wholesome for this reason, that it can contemplate the idea of success or triumph in the hopeless fight towards the ethical ideal, in what Stevenson called, with his usual startling felicity, "the lost fight of virtue." A modern morality, on the other hand, can only point with absolute conviction to the horrors that follow breaches of law; its only certainty is a certainty of ill. It can only point to imperfection. It has no perfection to point to. But the monk meditating upon Christ or Buddha has in his mind an image of perfect health, a thing of clear colours and clean air. He may contemplate this ideal wholeness and happiness far more than he ought; he may contemplate it to the neglect of exclusion of essential THINGS he may contemplate it until he has become a dreamer or a driveller; but still it is wholeness and happiness that he is contemplating. He may even go mad; but he is going mad for the love of sanity. But the modern student of ethics, even if he remains sane, remains sane from an insane dread of insanity.
The anchorite rolling on the stones in a frenzy of submission is a healthier person fundamentally than many a sober man in a silk hat who is walking down Cheapside. For many such are good only through a withering knowledge of evil. I am not at this moment claiming for the devotee anything more than this primary advantage, that though he may be making himself personally weak and miserable, he is still fixing his thoughts largely on gigantic strength and happiness, on a strength that has no limits, and a happiness that has no end. Doubtless there are other objections which can be urged without unreason against the influence of gods and visions in morality, whether in the cell or street. But this advantage the mystic morality must always have-it is always jollier. A young man may keep himself from vice by continually thinking of disease. He may keep himself from it also by continually thinking of the Virgin Mary. There may be question about which method is the more reasonable, or even about which is the more efficient. But surely there can be no question about which is the more wholesome.
I remember a pamphlet by that able and sincere secularist, Mr. G. W. Foote, which contained a phrase sharply symbolizing and dividing these two methods. The pamphlet was called BEER AND BIBLE, those two very noble things, all the nobler for a conjunction which Mr. Foote, in his stern old Puritan way, seemed to think sardonic, but which I confess to thinking appropriate and charming. I have not the work by me, but I remember that Mr. Foote dismissed very contemptuously any attempts to deal with the problem of strong drink by religious offices or intercessions, and said that a picture of a drunkard's liver would be more efficacious in the matter of temperance than any prayer or praise. In that picturesque expression, it seems to me, is perfectly embodied the incurable morbidity of modern ethics. In that temple the lights are low, the crowds kneel, the solemn anthems are uplifted. But that upon the altar to which all men kneel is no longer the perfect flesh, the body and substance of the perfect man; it is still flesh, but it is diseased. It is the drunkard's liver of the New Testament that is marred for us, which we take in remembrance of him.
Now, it is this great gap in modern ethics, the absence of vivid pictures of purity and spiritual triumph, which lies at the back of the real objection felt by so many sane men to the realistic literature of the nineteenth century. If any ordinary man ever said that he was horrified by the subjects discussed in Ibsen or Maupassant, or by the plain language in which they are spoken of, that ordinary man was lying. The average conversation of average men throughout the whole of modern civilization in every class or trade is such as Zola would never dream of printing. Nor is the habit of writing thus of these things a new habit. On the contrary, it is the Victorian prudery and silence which is new still, though it is already dying. The tradition of calling a spade a spade starts very early in our literature and comes down very late. But the truth is that the ordinary honest man, whatever vague account he may have given of his feelings, was not either disgusted or even annoyed at the candour of the moderns. What disgusted him, and very justly, was not the presence of a clear realism, but the absence of a clear idealism. Strong and genuine religious sentiment has never had any objection to realism; on the contrary, religion was the realistic thing, the brutal thing, the thing that called names. This is the great difference between some recent developments of Nonconformity and the great Puritanism of the seventeenth century. It was the whole point of the Puritans that they cared nothing for decency. Modern Nonconformist newspapers distinguish themselves by suppressing precisely those nouns and adjectives which the founders of Nonconformity distinguished themselves by flinging at kings and queens. But if it was a chief claim of religion that it spoke plainly about evil, it was the chief claim of all that it spoke plainly about good. The thing which is resented, and, as I think, rightly resented, in that great modern literature of which Ibsen is typical, is that while the eye that can perceive what are the wrong things increases in an uncanny and devouring clarity, the eye which sees what things are right is growing mistier and mistier every moment, till it goes almost blind with doubt. If we compare, let us say, the morality of the DIVINE COMEDY with the morality of Ibsen's GHOSTS, we shall see all that modern ethics have really done. No one, I imagine, will accuse the author of the INFERNO of an Early Victorian prudishness or a Podsnapian optimism. But Dante describes three moral instruments-Heaven, Purgatory, and Hell, the vision of perfection, the vision of improvement, and the vision of failure. Ibsen has only one-Hell. It is often said, and with perfect truth, that no one could read a play like GHOSTS and remain indifferent to the necessity of an ethical self-command. That is quite true, and the same is to be said of the most monstrous and material descriptions of the eternal fire. It is quite certain the realists like Zola do in one sense promote morality-they promote it in the sense in which the hangman promotes it, in the sense in which the devil promotes it. But they only affect that small minority which will accept any virtue of courage. Most healthy people dismiss these moral dangers as they dismiss the possibility of bombs or microbes. Modern realists are indeed Terrorists, like the dynamiters; and they fail just as much in their effort to create a thrill. Both realists and dynamiters are well-meaning people engaged in the task, so obviously ultimately hopeless, of using science to promote morality.
I do not wish the reader to confuse me for a moment with those vague persons who imagine that Ibsen is what they call a pessimist. There are plenty of wholesome people in Ibsen, plenty of good people, plenty of happy people, plenty of examples of men acting wisely and things ending well. That is not my meaning. My meaning is that Ibsen has throughout, and does not disguise, a certain vagueness and a changing attitude as well as a doubting attitude towards what is really wisdom and virtue in this life-a vagueness which contrasts very remarkably with the decisiveness with which he pounces on something which he perceives to be a root of evil, some convention, some deception, some ignorance. We know that the hero of GHOSTS is mad, and we know why he is mad. We do also know that Dr. Stockman is sane; but we do not know why he is sane. Ibsen does not profess to know how virtue and happiness are brought about, in the sense that he professes to know how our modern sexual tragedies are brought about. Falsehood works ruin in THE PILLARS OF SOCIETY, but truth works equal ruin in THE WILD DUCK. There are no cardinal virtues of Ibsenism. There is no ideal man of Ibsen. All this is not only admitted, but vaunted in the most valuable and thoughtful of all the eulogies upon Ibsen, Mr. Bernard Shaw's QUINTESSENCE OF IBSENISM. Mr. Shaw sums up Ibsen's teaching in the phrase, "The golden rule is that there is no golden rule." In his eyes this absence of an enduring and positive ideal, this absence of a permanent key to virtue, is the one great Ibsen merit. I am not discussing now with any fullness whether this is so or not. All I venture to point out, with an increased firmness, is that this omission, good or bad, does leave us face to face with the problem of a human consciousness filled with very definite images of evil, and with no definite image of good. To us light must be henceforward the dark thing-the thing of which we cannot speak. To us, as to Milton's devils in Pandemonium, it is darkness that is visible. The human race, according to religion, fell once, and in falling gained knowledge of good and of evil. Now we have fallen a second time, and only the knowledge of evil remains to us.
A great silent collapse, an enormous unspoken disappointment, has in our time fallen on our Northern civilization. All previous ages have sweated and been crucified in an attempt to realize what is really the right life, what was really the good man. A definite part of the modern world has come beyond question to the conclusion that there is no answer to these questions, that the most that we can do is to set up a few notice-boards at places of obvious danger, to warn men, for instance, against drinking themselves to death, or ignoring the mere existence of their neighbours. Ibsen is the first to return from the baffled hunt to bring us the tidings of great failure.
Every one of the popular modern phrases and ideals is a dodge in order to shirk the problem of what is good. We are fond of talking about "liberty"; that, as we talk of it, is a dodge to avoid discussing what is good. We are fond of talking about "progress"; that is a dodge to avoid discussing what is good. We are fond of talking about "education"; that is a dodge to avoid discussing what is good. The modern man says, "Let us leave all these arbitrary standards and embrace liberty." This is, logically rendered, "Let us not decide what is good, but let it be considered good not to decide it." He says, "Away with your old moral formulae; I am for progress." This, logically stated, means, "Let us not settle what is good; but let us settle whether we are getting more of it." He says, "Neither in religion nor morality, my friend, lie the hopes of the race, but in education." This, clearly expressed, means, "We cannot decide what is good, but let us give it to our children."
Mr. H.G. Wells, that exceedingly clear-sighted man, has pointed out in a recent work that this has happened in connection with economic questions. The old economists, he says, made generalizations, and they were (in Mr. Wells's view) mostly wrong. But the new economists, he says, seem to have lost the power of making any generalizations at all. And they cover this incapacity with a general claim to be, in specific cases, regarded as "experts", a claim "proper enough in a hairdresser or a fashionable physician, but indecent in a philosopher or a man of science." But in spite of the refreshing rationality with which Mr. Wells has indicated this, it must also be said that he himself has fallen into the same enormous modern error. In the opening pages of that excellent book MANKIND IN THE MAKING, he dismisses the ideals of art, religion, abstract morality, and the rest, and says that he is going to consider men in their chief function, the function of parenthood. He is going to discuss life as a "tissue of births." He is not going to ask what will produce satisfactory saints or satisfactory heroes, but what will produce satisfactory fathers and mothers. The whole is set forward so sensibly that it is a few moments at least before the reader realises that it is another example of unconscious shirking. What is the good of begetting a man until we have settled what is the good of being a man? You are merely handing on to him a problem you dare not settle yourself. It is as if a man were asked, "What is the use of a hammer?" and answered, "To make hammers"; and when asked, "And of those hammers, what is the use?" answered, "To make hammers again". Just as such a man would be perpetually putting off the question of the ultimate use of carpentry, so Mr. Wells and all the rest of us are by these phrases successfully putting off the question of the ultimate value of the human life.
The case of the general talk of "progress" is, indeed, an extreme one. As enunciated today, "progress" is simply a comparative of which we have not settled the superlative. We meet every ideal of religion, patriotism, beauty, or brute pleasure with the alternative ideal of progress-that is to say, we meet every proposal of getting something that we know about, with an alternative proposal of getting a great deal more of nobody knows what. Progress, properly understood, has, indeed, a most dignified and legitimate meaning. But as used in opposition to precise moral ideals, it is ludicrous. So far from it being the truth that the ideal of progress is to be set against that of ethical or religious finality, the reverse is the truth. Nobody has any business to use the word "progress" unless he has a definite creed and a cast-iron code of morals. Nobody can be progressive without being doctrinal; I might almost say that nobody can be progressive without being infallible-at any rate, without believing in some infallibility. For progress by its very name indicates a direction; and the moment we are in the least doubtful about the direction, we become in the same degree doubtful about the progress. Never perhaps since the beginning of the world has there been an age that had less right to use the word "progress" than we. In the Catholic twelfth century, in the philosophic eighteenth century, the direction may have been a good or a bad one, men may have differed more or less about how far they went, and in what direction, but about the direction they did in the main agree, and consequently they had the genuine sensation of progress. But it is precisely about the direction that we disagree. Whether the future excellence lies in more law or less law, in more liberty or less liberty; whether property will be finally concentrated or finally cut up; whether sexual passion will reach its sanest in an almost virgin intellectualism or in a full animal freedom; whether we should love everybody with Tolstoy, or spare nobody with Nietzsche;-these are the things about which we are actually fighting most. It is not merely true that the age which has settled least what is progress is this "progressive" age. It is, moreover, true that the people who have settled least what is progress are the most "progressive" people in it. The ordinary mass, the men who have never troubled about progress, might be trusted perhaps to progress. The particular individuals who talk about progress would certainly fly to the four winds of heaven when the pistol-shot started the race. I do not, therefore, say that the word "progress" is unmeaning; I say it is unmeaning without the previous definition of a moral doctrine, and that it can only be applied to groups of persons who hold that doctrine in common. Progress is not an illegitimate word, but it is logically evident that it is illegitimate for us. It is a sacred word, a word which could only rightly be used by rigid believers and in the ages of faith.

Current Page: 1

Word Lists:

Morbidity : the condition of suffering from a disease or medical condition

Realist : a person who accepts a situation as it is and is prepared to deal with it accordingly

Morality : principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior

Generalization : a general statement or concept obtained by inference from specific cases

Rationality : the quality of being based on or in accordance with reason or logic

Drivel : nonsense

Shirk : avoid or neglect (a duty or responsibility)

Progress : forward or onward movement toward a destination

Illegitimate : not authorized by the law; not in accordance with accepted standards or rules

Pessimist : a person who tends to see the worst aspect of things or believe that the worst will happen

More...

Additional Information:

Rating: C Words in the Passage: 2828 Unique Words: 891 Sentences: 133
Noun: 655 Conjunction: 266 Adverb: 186 Interjection: 1
Adjective: 277 Pronoun: 199 Verb: 478 Preposition: 336
Letter Count: 12,719 Sentiment: Positive / Positive / Positive Tone: Neutral (Slightly Formal) Difficult Words: 582
EdSearch WebSearch
Questions and Answers

Please wait while we generate questions and answers...

Ratings & Comments

Write a Review
5 Star
0
0
4 Star
0
0
3 Star
0
0
2 Star
0
0
1 Star
0
0
0

0 Ratings & 0 Reviews

Report an Error