Why Calculus? - Lesson 1 | Don't Memorise - Free Educational videos for Students in K-12 | Lumos Learning

Why Calculus? - Lesson 1 | Don't Memorise - Free Educational videos for Students in k-12


Why Calculus? - Lesson 1 | Don't Memorise - By JenniferESL



Transcript
00:03 while playing with the ball . Nora gets curious about
00:07 its motion as she drops the ball on the floor
00:10 . She asks herself what will be its speed as
00:14 it reaches midway in its path , She drops the
00:18 ball from a height one m above the ground .
00:21 It covers 50 cm to reach the midpoint . Nora
00:25 knows that it took one second for the ball to
00:28 reach the mid point B . With this information .
00:32 Can't you find the speed of the ball exactly when
00:34 it's at point B . Like you'd probably be thinking
00:40 ? Nora also thinks the speed of the ball will
00:42 be the distance traveled by , it divided by the
00:45 time taken to reach that point . So she comes
00:49 up with the answer 50 cm/s or 0.5 m/s .
00:56 But is this the speed of the ball when it's
00:58 at point B . No , it's not . This
01:01 answer would have been correct if the speed of the
01:04 ball was constant throughout its motion . But we note
01:08 that the speed of the ball increases as it falls
01:11 . So the answer Nora got is actually the average
01:15 speed of the ball as it reaches the position be
01:18 . But what we are interested in is the speed
01:21 exactly at the instant when the ball is at position
01:24 being that is called the instantaneous speed of the ball
01:29 . Can you try finding the instantaneous speed ? Let's
01:34 see what happens at the instant . The ball is
01:37 at position . Be the distance traveled by the ball
01:41 at this instant is zero at the time elapsed at
01:44 this instant is zero . So we get the speed
01:48 to be zero divided by zero , which is undefined
01:52 . Doesn't make any sense . Right ? So how
01:55 do we then find the instantaneous speed of the ball
01:59 ? Calculus is the branch of mathematics that helps us
02:02 answer this question . How we will see that in
02:06 the latest section of this course . But wait another
02:10 thought , puzzled Nora as she drops the ball .
02:14 She wonders why the ball ever reaches the floor .
02:18 This might seem to be a lame thought , but
02:20 don't forget that Nora smart , she thinks that mathematically
02:25 the ball should never touch the ground . So what
02:28 was her thought process ? Let's see , suppose she
02:32 drops the ball from a height one m above the
02:35 floor now to reach the floor first the ball has
02:38 to cover half this distance to reach point B .
02:42 Then the ball has to cover half of the remaining
02:44 distance , that is 1/4 of a meter . Then
02:49 the ball has to cover the next half , then
02:51 the next half and so on . It means the
02:55 number of steps the ball has to cover to reach
02:58 the floor does not end . That is there are
03:01 infinite number of steps the ball has to perform and
03:05 to perform these steps , the ball takes an infinite
03:08 amount of time . So according to this logic Nora
03:11 thinks the ball requires an infinite amount of time to
03:15 reach the floor . Therefore the ball should never reach
03:18 the floor right . Do you also think the same
03:22 ? Do you think Nora went wrong somewhere ? Share
03:27 your thoughts in the comments section ? Yeah , actually
03:32 , Nora isn't the only one who was puzzled by
03:34 this many centuries ago . The same thought puzzled a
03:38 greek philosopher Zeno of Elia . This is usually referred
03:43 to as Zinos dichotomy paradox . Even though we know
03:47 that when we dropped the ball it reaches the floor
03:50 . This logical and mathematical conclusion tells us that it
03:54 should never reach the floor again . A satisfactory answer
03:59 to the Zeno . S paradox is provided by calculus
04:04 . We saw two examples here that calculus can give
04:07 us the answer to . But before looking at the
04:10 central ideas of calculus we will further explore what other
04:15 real life problems calculus can help us with . If
04:22 we're on a cliff next to the sea it's always
04:25 tempting to randomly throw stones into the sea . It's
04:28 so much fun . Right ? But have you ever
04:31 wondered about the best possible way to throw a stone
04:34 ? Such that it covers the maximum distance ? Knowing
04:38 this was certainly important in the past to attack the
04:42 enemy ship . Now let's get back to our question
04:46 . If we throw a stone too high we know
04:49 it will not cover maximum distance . What to feed
04:52 through the stone horizontally . Mhm . Maybe not by
04:57 experience . We know instead of throwing the stone horizontally
05:01 if we throw it at an angle it will cover
05:03 greater distance . Of course the answer also depends on
05:08 the speed with which you throw the stone . Let's
05:11 say if you apply all your energy , you can
05:14 throw it with a speed V . So if we
05:17 throw the stone with a speed , we at what
05:19 angle should we throw it to cover ? Maximum possible
05:22 distance ? As the angle at which we throw the
05:26 stone changes . The distance covered by it changes .
05:30 And this is where calculus comes into play . To
05:33 get the answer , we need to know how the
05:36 distance covered by the stone changes as the angle we
05:40 throw it at changes . And this is exactly the
05:43 kind of problem that calculus helps us with . All
05:47 right , so calculus helps us with analyzing things in
05:50 motion . For instance , finding the instantaneous speed of
05:54 an object or finding the angle at which to throw
05:57 the stone . But wait , let me ask you
06:00 a completely random question . Look at this trajectory of
06:04 the stone . What do you think will be this
06:07 area ? under the dashed curved path . We know
06:12 how to find the area of a simple shape .
06:14 Like the rectangle . Its area is equal to its
06:18 length time , its width . But how do we
06:20 get this formula ? Let's say the length of the
06:24 rectangle is five cm and its width is 10 cm
06:29 . Then the area of the rectangle is 50 square
06:32 cm . So what does this mean ? It means
06:37 that if we take a square tile of length of
06:39 one centimeter , that is a square tile of area
06:42 one square centimeter , Then 50 such tiles will cover
06:46 this rectangle . Now let's get back to our question
06:51 . What will the area be under this curve ?
06:54 Should we cover this area also with square tiles .
06:57 This will not work right . Look at the square
07:00 tiles covering the curve . We have a problem here
07:04 , as they don't fit perfectly . Then how can
07:07 we figure out this area you would have guessed by
07:11 now that calculus helps us to find the answer .
07:15 We know the area of simple shapes like rectangles ,
07:18 triangles , polygons , and so on Here at the
07:22 formulas . This is easy because straight lines are involved
07:27 , but the shapes that we encounter in our daily
07:30 lives are not that simple as curves are involved .
07:34 That's where calculus comes into the picture . So we've
07:38 seen that other than finding the instantaneous speed of an
07:42 object and the angle at which to throw an object
07:45 to cover maximum distance , calculus also helps us to
07:49 find the area of different shapes . In this course
07:52 about calculus , we will explore each of these examples
07:56 in detail , but before moving on , let's have
07:59 a glimpse at the central idea around calculus . This
08:03 idea was used by greek mathematicians to find the area
08:07 of a shape . Long before calculus was developed ,
08:11 consider this circle with radius R . How would you
08:15 find its area ? Considered these two triangles . One
08:21 circumscribed around the circle and the other inscribed inside it
08:26 . We can say that the area of the circle
08:28 will be between the areas of these two triangles .
08:32 Now , what if he used squares instead of triangles
08:36 ? We will get a better approximation of the area
08:39 of circle . If instead of triangles , we used
08:42 squares , we can further improve our results If we
08:46 used pentagon's , Did you get the idea ? Can
08:51 you tell me how we can improve the approximation further
08:55 ? As we consider polygons with greater number of sites
08:59 , we will get close to the circle , the
09:02 area of the polygon inscribed in the circle and the
09:06 area of the polygon , circumscribing the circle , get
09:09 closer to each other . This was the method used
09:12 by greek mathematicians to find the area of the circle
09:17 . It's called the method of exhaustion . This is
09:20 the central idea of calculus used to solve the problems
09:23 we mentioned above with this knowledge . Do you think
09:28 we can solve our problem of finding the instantaneous speed
09:31 of an object ? Think about the ways in which
09:35 you can approach the problem and share your thoughts in
09:38 the comments section . Mhm . In the next part
09:42 we will see how to find the instantaneous speed of
09:45 an object , and the idea applied to calculate the
09:48 area of a shape . We will also discover that
09:52 these two ideas are related to each other . See
09:56 you in the next part .
Summarizer

DESCRIPTION:

OVERVIEW:

Why Calculus? - Lesson 1 | Don't Memorise is a free educational video by JenniferESL.

This page not only allows students and teachers view Why Calculus? - Lesson 1 | Don't Memorise videos but also find engaging Sample Questions, Apps, Pins, Worksheets, Books related to the following topics.


GRADES:


STANDARDS:

Are you the Publisher?

EdSearch WebSearch