Math Antics - Scientific Notation - By mathantics
Transcript
00:0-1 | Hi rob here with Math Antics . Just wanted to | |
00:02 | say hi to all the people who watch our videos | |
00:05 | and say thank you so much for watching and liking | |
00:08 | and subscribing . I know we usually don't do milestone | |
00:11 | videos , but this seemed like a pretty cool milestone | |
00:14 | that we just had to mention it . We have | |
00:17 | one times 10 to the six YouTube subscribers . That's | |
00:20 | crazy . That's awesome . Thank you so much . | |
00:24 | Oh wait , You don't know what numbers like ? | |
00:26 | One times 10 to the six even mean ? Well | |
00:28 | , you're in luck . We have a video that | |
00:30 | explains it . In fact , it's this video that | |
00:32 | you're watching right now . Uh huh . Hi , | |
00:40 | I'm rob . Welcome to Math Antics . Have you | |
00:43 | ever heard people use numbers like that ? One times | |
00:46 | 10 to the sixth ? Or maybe 3.4 times 10 | |
00:48 | to the negative eighth . Well , those are examples | |
00:51 | of a way of writing numbers called scientific notation . | |
00:55 | Huh ? That didn't sound quite right . Let me | |
00:57 | try that again . Scientific notation . Uh Yes , | |
01:02 | that's better . Numbers can be really big or really | |
01:06 | small , right ? Like if you wanted to count | |
01:08 | up all of the cells that make up your body | |
01:11 | , it would be a really big number , Something | |
01:13 | like 35 trillion cells . But if you wanted to | |
01:17 | measure the diameter of one of those cells using meters | |
01:20 | , you'd get a really small number , something like | |
01:23 | 0.000005 m . Not only are really big or small | |
01:30 | numbers , a lot of work to write down because | |
01:32 | of all the zeros , they're hard to quickly evaluate | |
01:35 | and compare at a glance . It's not easy to | |
01:37 | tell just how many number of places there are in | |
01:40 | these really big or small numbers . And that's where | |
01:43 | scientific notation can really help us out , instead of | |
01:46 | using a long sequence of decimal digits to represent numbers | |
01:50 | . Scientific notation uses a shorter number , multiplied by | |
01:53 | a power of 10 . And it's always in that | |
01:56 | form some number times 10 to the some exponent . | |
02:00 | Here's an example of a really long number . 125 | |
02:04 | million . And here's the equivalent number written in scientific | |
02:07 | notation . 1.25 times 10 to the 8th . Want | |
02:11 | to see how these two numbers are . Just different | |
02:13 | ways of writing the same thing . Let's start by | |
02:16 | making a copy of our big number and messing with | |
02:18 | its decimal point a bit . Where's the decimal point | |
02:20 | ? You ask ? Remember that ? It's always right | |
02:22 | here , immediately to the right of the ones place | |
02:25 | . We just don't need to show it if there | |
02:27 | aren't any decimal digits . Okay , so what would | |
02:30 | happen if we shift the decimal .1 place to the | |
02:32 | left ? Well doing that would change the number right | |
02:36 | . By definition , the decimal point is always immediately | |
02:39 | to the right of the ones place . So shifting | |
02:42 | the decimal point shifts the ones place and all the | |
02:44 | other number of places to . And if we line | |
02:47 | up the ones place of our new number with the | |
02:49 | ones place of the original number , you see that | |
02:51 | the new number is 10 times smaller . That means | |
02:54 | shifting the decimal .1 place to the left is equivalent | |
02:58 | to dividing the number by 10 . But do we | |
03:01 | want a number that's 10 times smaller than before ? | |
03:03 | Well no , we don't want to change the value | |
03:06 | of the number at all . We just want to | |
03:08 | write it in a different way . Since shifting the | |
03:10 | decimal resulted in a number that's 10 times smaller than | |
03:13 | before to compensate and keep the value the same . | |
03:16 | We need to multiply the new number by 10 , | |
03:19 | making the number smaller and then compensating for that might | |
03:22 | seem like a weird thing to do but it will | |
03:24 | make more sense in a minute . Let's do that | |
03:26 | process again . Let's make a copy of the new | |
03:28 | number and shift the decimal point to the left again | |
03:31 | . Since that shifts all the number of places , | |
03:34 | we can align the ones places and see that the | |
03:36 | same thing happened . The new number is 10 times | |
03:39 | smaller than before . So to keep it the same | |
03:41 | value as the original number we need to compensate by | |
03:44 | making it 10 times bigger . We need to multiply | |
03:47 | by another 10 . And if we repeat that process | |
03:50 | again if we make another copy and shift the decimal | |
03:53 | point again we'll see that the number gets 10 times | |
03:55 | smaller . So we need to compensate by multiplying by | |
03:58 | another 10 . Alright time out we seem to have | |
04:01 | a little problem here . Each time we shift the | |
04:03 | decimal point to the left . Our number gets smaller | |
04:06 | but since we have to compensate with a factor of | |
04:09 | 10 each time it's making kind of a mess . | |
04:12 | This part is getting shorter but this part is getting | |
04:14 | longer . No problem . Exponents can fix that . | |
04:18 | Do you remember that ? Exponents are a way of | |
04:19 | writing repeated multiplication . If you don't then be sure | |
04:23 | to watch our videos about them before moving on . | |
04:26 | Instead of writing 10 times 10 we can write 10 | |
04:29 | to the second power . And instead of writing 10 | |
04:31 | times 10 times 10 we can write 10 to the | |
04:34 | third power . That's much better now we can continue | |
04:37 | on will shift the decimal point again and multiplied by | |
04:40 | 10 again . But this time instead of writing another | |
04:43 | times 10 we can just increase the exponent by one | |
04:47 | . Since there would be a total of four tens | |
04:49 | being multiplied together . Let's keep going with this process | |
04:52 | of shifting the decimal point to the left and multiplying | |
04:55 | by tim for each number place we shift and we'll | |
04:58 | stop when there's only one digit remaining to the left | |
05:01 | of the decimal point , wow that's quite a pattern | |
05:05 | . Each time we shifted the decimal the number got | |
05:07 | 10 times smaller . So each time we had to | |
05:09 | multiply it by another 10 to keep the value the | |
05:12 | same . And because we did that each one of | |
05:15 | these lines represents the same value . So even though | |
05:18 | it looks a lot different , this last line has | |
05:21 | the exact same value as the first one . In | |
05:23 | fact it's just the original number written in scientific notation | |
05:28 | . But why is it only this last line and | |
05:30 | not any of the others ? I mean they all | |
05:32 | look pretty scientific to me . That's a good question | |
05:36 | for a number to be in proper scientific notation , | |
05:39 | it's supposed to have only one digit to the left | |
05:41 | of the decimal . There can be more than one | |
05:43 | digit to the right of the decimal depending on the | |
05:45 | accuracy of the number , but just one digit to | |
05:48 | the left . But why , I mean that rule | |
05:51 | sounds kind of arbitrary . It's not arbitrary at all | |
05:55 | . If there's more than one digit to the left | |
05:57 | of the decimal point , that would mean that we | |
05:58 | didn't get out all of the factors of 10 that | |
06:00 | we could have . And factoring out all of the | |
06:03 | tents helps us quickly determine a numbers , order of | |
06:06 | magnitude , Order of magnitude . What in the world | |
06:09 | is that ? That sounds kind of scary . Order | |
06:12 | of magnitude is basically just how many tens you need | |
06:15 | to multiply to get a certain number . And when | |
06:18 | a number is in scientific notation , the order of | |
06:20 | magnitude is just the exponent . Because that's telling us | |
06:23 | how many tends to multiply together . In this example | |
06:27 | the scientific notation says that if we take this small | |
06:30 | decimal and multiply it by eight tins will get our | |
06:32 | original number . So scientific notation is a way of | |
06:36 | taking a really big number and reducing it down to | |
06:39 | a value that's less than 10 . But keeping track | |
06:42 | of how many tens we need to multiply together to | |
06:44 | get the full number . You can think of it | |
06:46 | as basically just extracting its order of magnitude and storing | |
06:50 | an exponent form . But why would we want to | |
06:53 | do that ? I mean it seems kind of complicated | |
06:56 | . Well yeah but did you see how much writing | |
06:59 | it saved us ? When we rode out 125 million | |
07:02 | we had to write 11 characters including commas . But | |
07:06 | when we wrote the same number in scientific notation we | |
07:10 | only had to write eight characters . What ? Not | |
07:13 | convinced that it's worth the savings . Well how about | |
07:16 | this number ? That's a lot of Zeros to right | |
07:19 | isn't it ? But in scientific notation this number is | |
07:22 | just 8.4 times 10 to the 31st power . That's | |
07:26 | much better . So scientific notation is very useful when | |
07:30 | it comes to writing down really large numbers or really | |
07:34 | small ones . For example , this number is really | |
07:37 | small . 0.0000095 . It's much less than one but | |
07:44 | it's not zero and here's the same number written in | |
07:47 | scientific notation . Again it consists of a number that | |
07:51 | has only one digit to the left of the decimal | |
07:53 | point which is being multiplied by 10 to a certain | |
07:56 | power . But do you notice anything different about the | |
07:59 | exponent , yep . It's negative . So what does | |
08:02 | that mean ? Well the short answer is that positive | |
08:05 | ? Exponents show repeated multiplication or negative exponents show repeated | |
08:10 | division . And since this is a negative exponent with | |
08:13 | 10 as the base it means to repeatedly divide by | |
08:16 | 10 to see how that works . Let's copy our | |
08:19 | original number and do that decimal point shift thing again | |
08:22 | . Only this time we're going to shift the decimal | |
08:24 | point to the right . What happens if we shift | |
08:27 | at one place to the right ? It makes the | |
08:29 | number 10 times bigger than it was before . There | |
08:32 | used to be six zeros between the decimal point in | |
08:34 | the night but now there's only five again we don't | |
08:37 | want to change the value . So what can we | |
08:39 | do to compensate for shifting the decimal point In this | |
08:42 | case ? Since shifting one place to the right made | |
08:45 | the number 10 times bigger . We need to compensate | |
08:48 | by dividing the number by 10 . And because the | |
08:51 | way multiplication and division are related , dividing by 10 | |
08:54 | is the same as multiplying by 1/10 or 1/10 . | |
08:58 | So we can just multiply by 1/10 . Or we | |
09:01 | can multiply it by 10 to the -1 Because 10 | |
09:04 | to the -1 is just another way of writing 1/10 | |
09:07 | . That may seem odd if you haven't learned about | |
09:09 | negative exponents before and we explain it in more detail | |
09:13 | in our video about the laws of exponents For now | |
09:16 | , all you really need to know is that multiplying | |
09:18 | by 10 to the negative one is the same as | |
09:20 | dividing by 10 . So it compensates for shifting the | |
09:23 | decimal .1 place to the rate Continuing on . If | |
09:27 | we shift the decimal point , another place to the | |
09:29 | right . The same thing happens , we make the | |
09:31 | number 10 times bigger . So to keep the value | |
09:34 | the same we have to multiply by another factor of | |
09:36 | 10 to the -1 . And if you're wondering whether | |
09:39 | we can combine these exponents , you're on the right | |
09:41 | track 10 to the negative one times 10 to the | |
09:44 | negative one . Combined to become 10 to the negative | |
09:47 | too . Which makes sense because we shifted the decimal | |
09:50 | point a total of two places to the right . | |
09:53 | And if we shift the decimal .3 places to the | |
09:55 | right we need to multiply by 10 to the negative | |
09:58 | three to compensate . And if we shift four places | |
10:01 | then we need 10 to the negative four to compensate | |
10:03 | get the idea . And if we continue doing that | |
10:06 | until the decimal point is positioned so that there's only | |
10:09 | one digit to the left of it . That gives | |
10:11 | us the number in scientific notation 9 , 5 times | |
10:15 | 10 to the -7 . And can you figure out | |
10:18 | what the order of magnitude of this number is , | |
10:20 | Yep , just like before the exponent tells us it's | |
10:23 | -7 . Being able to quickly identify a numbers . | |
10:27 | Order of magnitude is pretty handy . For example , | |
10:30 | if the order of magnitude is a big positive exponent | |
10:33 | , then you know right away that you're dealing with | |
10:35 | a really big number . But if it's a big | |
10:38 | negative exponent then you know , you're dealing with a | |
10:41 | really small number . And if you're comparing two really | |
10:45 | big numbers like these two or two really small numbers | |
10:48 | like these two , it's hard to tell at a | |
10:50 | glance which is actually bigger or smaller , but if | |
10:54 | you see them in scientific notation , it's easy to | |
10:56 | see that this numbers order of magnitude is bigger than | |
10:58 | the others , which means that it's bigger and this | |
11:01 | number is order of magnitude is less than the others | |
11:03 | , which means that it's smaller . So now that | |
11:06 | you've seen how scientific notation works and you realize that | |
11:09 | it's just a shorthand way of writing . Really big | |
11:12 | or really small numbers . Let's break down the procedure | |
11:15 | for converting back and forth between numbers written in regular | |
11:18 | form and scientific notation . Starting with these two examples | |
11:21 | in regular form . First count how many number of | |
11:24 | places you need to shift the decimal point for there | |
11:27 | to be only one digit to the left of it | |
11:29 | . For this number we would need to shift eight | |
11:31 | places and for this number six places , the number | |
11:34 | of places you need to shift will be the exponent | |
11:37 | in the scientific notation for . But the sign of | |
11:39 | that exponent is determined by the direction you shifted . | |
11:43 | If you shifted to the left because you started with | |
11:45 | a big number then the exponent will be positive . | |
11:48 | But if you shifted to the right because you started | |
11:51 | with a small number , then the exponent will be | |
11:53 | negative . So that gives you the times 10 to | |
11:56 | the something part of the scientific notation . And to | |
11:59 | get the number that's multiplied by that power of 10 | |
12:02 | , you just take the shifted decimal number and remove | |
12:04 | any zeros that don't really need to be shown there | |
12:08 | . That wasn't too hard was it ? But what | |
12:10 | if we start out with numbers that are in scientific | |
12:12 | notation and want to convert them into regular form ? | |
12:15 | Let's do that with these two examples . The first | |
12:18 | step is to look at the exponent which is the | |
12:20 | order of magnitude of the number . It tells you | |
12:22 | how many tins you'll need to multiply or divide by | |
12:25 | to get the number in regular form . If the | |
12:27 | exponent is positive , it means that you'll need to | |
12:29 | multiply by that many tents in this example , that | |
12:33 | means that we need to multiply it by a total | |
12:35 | of seven tens to get the number in regular form | |
12:38 | . That would be a lot of work . But | |
12:39 | we can also just shift the decimal point . That | |
12:42 | number of places . Which direction do we need to | |
12:44 | shift it ? Well , since we're multiplying by factors | |
12:47 | of 10 , we need to shift it in the | |
12:49 | direction . That will make the number bigger . That | |
12:51 | is . We need to shift it to the right | |
12:53 | . So we'll just shift the decimal .7 places to | |
12:56 | the right . But as you can see there aren't | |
12:59 | seven digits after the decimal . So any places that | |
13:02 | don't have a digit would just be filled with a | |
13:04 | zero . There are number and regular form is 41 | |
13:08 | million , 650,000 . In the second example , the | |
13:12 | exponent is negative , which means that we'll need to | |
13:14 | divide by that number of tens to get the number | |
13:16 | in regular form again we could just do that division | |
13:20 | or we can shift the decimal point to save time | |
13:23 | . Since dividing by factors of 10 , make a | |
13:25 | number smaller will need to shift the decimal point in | |
13:28 | the direction that results in a smaller number that is | |
13:31 | to the left . Since our exponent is negative , | |
13:34 | five will shift the decimal .5 places to the left | |
13:38 | and any places that we shift past that don't already | |
13:40 | have a digit in them will get filled with zero | |
13:43 | . We'll also put a zero in the ones place | |
13:45 | . Since that's always good form for decimal numbers . | |
13:48 | There are a number in regular form . 0.0000 109 | |
13:54 | . All right . That's the basics of scientific notation | |
13:58 | . It may seem a little confusing at first , | |
14:01 | but as you get more experience with it , it | |
14:03 | makes a lot of sense . And when it comes | |
14:05 | to writing really big or really small numbers , it's | |
14:08 | totally worth it . And even if you understand how | |
14:11 | scientific notation works , it may take some practice to | |
14:14 | get good at converting back and forth between it and | |
14:17 | regular form , so be sure to practice on your | |
14:19 | own as always . Thanks for watching Math Antics and | |
14:22 | I'll see you next time . Learn more at Math | |
14:25 | Antics dot com . |
Summarizer
DESCRIPTION:
OVERVIEW:
Math Antics - Scientific Notation is a free educational video by mathantics.
This page not only allows students and teachers view Math Antics - Scientific Notation videos but also find engaging Sample Questions, Apps, Pins, Worksheets, Books related to the following topics.