Buffer Solutions - By The Organic Chemistry Tutor
00:00 | in this video we're going to talk about buffer solutions | |
00:03 | . A buffer solution is composed of a weak acid | |
00:07 | and the conjugate base . So let me give you | |
00:11 | some examples of that . HF , Hydrofluoric acid , | |
00:18 | that's a weak acid . The conjugate base of HF | |
00:22 | is fluoride . All you gotta do is remove a | |
00:24 | hydrogen . So we're gonna pair of fluoride with sodium | |
00:28 | . So here we have the weak acid and the | |
00:30 | conjugal weak base . Together these two components form a | |
00:34 | buffer solution . Another example will be acidic acid which | |
00:39 | is a weak acid . The conjugate base of acetic | |
00:43 | acid is acetate C two H 302 minus and we'll | |
00:48 | pick it up with the sodium ion . So sodium | |
00:50 | acetate will be the week base these two combined . | |
00:56 | They create a buffer solution . Or let's say if | |
00:59 | we have hydra cynic acid , H . D . | |
01:01 | N . With its conjugate base , sodium cyanide . | |
01:06 | This too will create above solution . So a buffer | |
01:09 | solution is composed of a weak acid and the congregate | |
01:12 | with base . The purpose of a buffer solution is | |
01:16 | to maintain a constant ph level throughout the solution . | |
01:20 | It resists changes in its ph Now it has the | |
01:27 | ability to do that because it contains both a weak | |
01:30 | acid and a weak base . So let's see if | |
01:32 | we have a solution of HF and sodium fluoride . | |
01:38 | So we have a buffer solution . If we were | |
01:41 | to add acid to this solution , let's say hydrochloric | |
01:44 | acid Instead of HDL , let's use H 30 plus | |
01:51 | . So if we were to add acid or anything | |
01:54 | that would increase the HDL plus concentration , the acid | |
01:59 | is going to react with the week based component of | |
02:01 | the buffer solution . So it's gonna react with fluoride | |
02:08 | . And so we're gonna get HF and water . | |
02:14 | If fluoride wasn't there , the ph would decrease dramatically | |
02:21 | when you have a high level of H 20 plus | |
02:23 | or hydro knee um ions in a solution , the | |
02:26 | pH will be very low and that's what assets do | |
02:31 | whenever you add an asset to a solution , it | |
02:33 | brings down the ph , but because fluoride reacts with | |
02:37 | the incoming hydrogen ions , you're not going to have | |
02:40 | a significant drop in ph Because they will quickly consume | |
02:44 | these ions in the solution , create an HF and | |
02:47 | one . Now let's look at the other situation . | |
02:52 | Let's say if we add a strong base , like | |
02:53 | sodium hydroxide , if we immediately increase the hydroxide ion | |
02:59 | concentration , the ph of the solution , it's going | |
03:03 | to go up . I mean , I take that | |
03:05 | back the people which is going to go down rather | |
03:08 | the ph is going to go up . These two | |
03:10 | are related to each other . Remember the ph is | |
03:15 | 14 minus the ph of the solution . So when | |
03:19 | the ph goes down , the ph goes up now | |
03:25 | , once you add hydroxide , it's going to react | |
03:27 | with the weak acid component of the buffers . So | |
03:30 | it's going to react with HF HF is going to | |
03:33 | quickly consume the hydroxide ions , creating fluoride and water | |
03:42 | . And so because HF quickly reacts with hydroxide , | |
03:46 | we're not going to see a sharp decrease in appeal | |
03:49 | wage of a solution nor will we see a sharp | |
03:51 | increase in the ph , the ph will increase slightly | |
03:55 | , but not by that much because these are being | |
03:58 | reacted with HF . And so that's how a buffer | |
04:01 | solution can maintain a relatively constant ph level in the | |
04:06 | solution . It's by having the ability to react with | |
04:10 | any incoming acid or any incoming base that is added | |
04:14 | to the solution . Now , let's talk about how | |
04:18 | we can calculate the ph of a buffer solution . | |
04:23 | So let's say we have a solution with Hydrofluoric acid | |
04:27 | and water and the solution also contains fluoride . So | |
04:41 | in this reaction we have the weak acid and the | |
04:44 | conjugate weak base . So we have a buffer solution | |
04:50 | . Everything is in the acquis phase except water . | |
04:54 | If we were to write the equation that is associated | |
04:57 | with K . A . The acid dissociation constant , | |
05:01 | this will be equal to the concentration of the products | |
05:13 | divided by the concentration of the reactant . So what | |
05:21 | is not included because it's in the liquid phase . | |
05:24 | Now what we're gonna do is we're gonna take the | |
05:26 | negative log of both sides of the equation . So | |
05:31 | we're gonna have negative log of K . A . | |
05:34 | And that's going to be equal to negative log of | |
05:38 | the right side of the equation . So we have | |
05:49 | f minus Times H 30 plus divided by HF . | |
06:03 | Now a property of logs allows us to split one | |
06:07 | log into two separate logs . So for instance let's | |
06:11 | say if we have log a B , we can | |
06:15 | write this as log A plus , log B . | |
06:21 | So let's say florida's a HBO plus is B . | |
06:25 | And HFC . We could also do this . If | |
06:28 | we have log A B , oversee , we can | |
06:35 | split be from A . N . C . So | |
06:38 | we can say this is log a oversea plus log | |
06:43 | B . We don't have to separate it from C | |
06:47 | . We can keep them together or we can separate | |
06:49 | them Right now I want to take out H20 plus | |
06:54 | out of this expression . So be would correspond to | |
06:58 | H . 20 Plus . I'm going to keep A | |
07:00 | N . C . The way it is , I'm | |
07:02 | going to use this property of the log expression . | |
07:10 | So this is going to be negative law K . | |
07:15 | A . And that's going to equal . So we | |
07:20 | need to distribute the negative sign . So keep that | |
07:21 | in mind . Negative log . We're going to have | |
07:29 | a oversea actually let's write log be first . So | |
07:35 | this is gonna be negative log atrial plus . And | |
07:43 | then we're gonna have log oversee with a negative sign | |
07:47 | because this has to be distributed and then minus log | |
07:54 | and then it's going to be the base over the | |
07:55 | acid . So florida is the base . HF is | |
08:02 | the acid . Now let's go ahead and delete some | |
08:13 | of the stuff that we have here to make some | |
08:15 | extra space . Now , some formulas that you need | |
08:19 | to be familiar with . All right , these two | |
08:21 | , you know that the ph is equal to the | |
08:23 | negative log Of H . 30 . Plus . You've | |
08:28 | seen that many times before at this point . Mhm | |
08:32 | . Also , you know that the p K . | |
08:36 | Is negative log K . A . So we can | |
08:40 | replace this with the PKK . We can replace this | |
08:45 | with ph so we have Pekka is equal to the | |
08:49 | ph minus the log of the base . In this | |
08:57 | case the bases f minus divided by the acid HF | |
09:11 | . Now you can put this in parentheses to indicate | |
09:14 | concentration . But since you have a ratio , it | |
09:16 | could be in moles as well . Because most similarity | |
09:23 | they have the same ratio given the same volume of | |
09:26 | the solution . Now , what we're gonna do is | |
09:31 | we're gonna isolate ph so I'm gonna take this term | |
09:35 | and move it to the other side . It's negative | |
09:41 | on the right side , but it's gonna be positive | |
09:43 | on the left side . So the PKK plus log | |
09:50 | of the base over the acid . And I'm going | |
09:53 | to replace this with a more generic form of the | |
09:55 | base , which is typically a minus . And the | |
10:00 | generic form of an asset would be H . A | |
10:06 | . On the right side . We still have ph | |
10:09 | , I'm going to reverse these two equations . I'm | |
10:12 | gonna put ph on the other side and I'm gonna | |
10:14 | put this on the other side . So if we | |
10:16 | simply reverse these two equations or just reverse the equation | |
10:22 | , rather by switching both sides , we're going to | |
10:25 | get the Henderson Hasselbach equation . So this equation helps | |
10:29 | us to calculate the ph of a buffer solution . | |
10:33 | So the ph is equal to the Peca of the | |
10:35 | acid plus log base over acid . A minus is | |
10:44 | the week based component of the acid , H . | |
10:47 | A . Is the weak acid . So that's how | |
10:49 | you can calculate the ph of a buffer solution . | |
10:53 | Is by using the Henderson Hasselbach equation . So the | |
10:57 | ph is dependent on the ratio of the contract base | |
11:04 | to the conjugate acid . Now there are some things | |
11:13 | that we can discern from this equation . What can | |
11:17 | we say regarding the ph of a buffer solution when | |
11:21 | the concentration of the weak acid is equal to the | |
11:25 | concentration of the conjugate base ? If H a equals | |
11:30 | a minus . What can we say about the ph | |
11:35 | If this is 10 and that is 10 , 10/10 | |
11:38 | is one . If this is .5 , that's .5.5.5 | |
11:43 | is one . So whenever these are the same and | |
11:47 | the 1-1 ratio , you get log of one , | |
11:51 | The log of one is 0 . So this disappears | |
11:55 | . Thus we have , the ph is equal to | |
11:57 | the P K . So whenever you have a buffer | |
12:01 | with an equal amount of weak acid and weak base | |
12:05 | , the ph will be equal to the PKK . | |
12:11 | So let's say if you want to create a buffer | |
12:14 | solution With or that centered at a ph of 4.5 | |
12:22 | . If you only create a buffer solution that's centered | |
12:24 | at that ph well , you want to find an | |
12:26 | acid With the PKK that is very close to 4.5 | |
12:32 | . Likewise , if you want to create a buffer | |
12:34 | solution with a ph that's centered around six point out | |
12:39 | , you want to look for an acid that has | |
12:41 | a peek a of A value that is close to | |
12:45 | six point close as possible . The closer the better | |
12:49 | . So that's how you can create a buffer solution | |
12:52 | that's centered at a given ph is by choosing the | |
12:55 | appropriate acid with the PKK that is very close to | |
12:58 | the ph . Now let's talk about the ratio of | |
13:04 | base to acid and acid base log 10 is one | |
13:15 | . Let's think about what that means . So let's | |
13:18 | say if a minus is 10 times the value of | |
13:23 | a change , Let's say this is one , M | |
13:28 | and H a is 0.1 . One divided by .1 | |
13:34 | is 10 . Lot of 10 is one . And | |
13:39 | let's say the peek A . Is for what's the | |
13:42 | ph The ph is going to be one unit higher | |
13:49 | whenever the ratio between acid debates or base to acid | |
13:53 | . When it differs whenever you have a 1 10 | |
13:55 | ratio , the ph is going to be one unit | |
13:58 | away from the PKK . If you have more of | |
14:01 | the acid , it's gonna be one unit lower than | |
14:04 | the peak . A if you have more of the | |
14:06 | base , it's one unit higher Log of a 100 | |
14:17 | is to 100 is 10 squared . A property of | |
14:22 | logs allows you to move the , export it to | |
14:24 | the front . So a lot of 10 squared is | |
14:27 | the same as too long . 10 and log 10 | |
14:30 | is one . So you get two times one , | |
14:32 | which is to So long of 100 is to . | |
14:36 | Therefore , if the ratio between base to acid or | |
14:39 | ask the base is 1-100 , The Ph will be | |
14:43 | two units away from the PKK Log of 1000 , | |
14:49 | which is log 10 to the 3rd . That's equally | |
14:54 | three . So if the ratio of acid base or | |
14:57 | base to acid is 1000 The Ph will be three | |
15:01 | units away from the PK . So let's say the | |
15:07 | PKK of a certain asset . We're going to say | |
15:10 | it's for actually , let's let's make it six . | |
15:19 | And let's say the numbers on this line represents the | |
15:21 | ph of the solution . When the Ph is six | |
15:25 | , we're going to have equal amounts of basin acid | |
15:29 | . So 50% will be based and 50% will be | |
15:38 | the weak acid H . A . Under those conditions | |
15:42 | , the ph will equal the PK . So we | |
15:49 | can describe that as a percentage . Or we can | |
15:52 | say , you know , we have one mauler of | |
15:56 | the conjugate base And then one molar solution of the | |
16:00 | conjugate acid At a Ph of seven . Let's keep | |
16:07 | the amount of basis . Same . Let's say it's | |
16:09 | one moller . The amount of acid will be 10 | |
16:12 | times less . It'll be .1 mm . Ahh . | |
16:19 | So as you can see here , we have more | |
16:21 | bass than acid . So the ph is going to | |
16:23 | be higher than the PKK Will be the situation at | |
16:28 | a page of eight . So if we have the | |
16:32 | same amount of base , The amount of acid will | |
16:36 | be 10 times less is going to be point 01 | |
16:39 | M . So any time the ph is well , | |
16:45 | anytime you have more based on acid , the ph | |
16:49 | will be greater than the P . K . So | |
16:52 | on the right side where a minus that is the | |
16:56 | week based component of the buffer . If it's greater | |
16:59 | than H . A . Or will be great in | |
17:01 | the H . A . Under those conditions , the | |
17:04 | ph will be greater than the PKK . Now , | |
17:11 | what if we had one M aging In .1 M | |
17:16 | . A minus ? What's the ph ? So here | |
17:20 | we have more of the acid than the base . | |
17:22 | So the ph is going to be less than the | |
17:23 | PK And the ratio is 1 - 10 . So | |
17:27 | we're gonna be one unit away from the PKK . | |
17:29 | Therefore the PhD will be , It's gonna be five | |
17:37 | . Likewise , let's see if we have .01 M | |
17:41 | a minus mhm and one M A chain . The | |
17:49 | ratio between asset base Or based the asset is like | |
17:53 | 1 - 100 . So Lot 200 is too , | |
17:58 | we're gonna be two minutes away from the PKK Or | |
18:02 | let's see if we have .001 of the base And | |
18:06 | the one molar solution of the acid . The ratio | |
18:10 | is 1-1000 one , divided by .001 is a 1000 | |
18:14 | . So we're gonna be three units away from the | |
18:16 | PK . So that's how you can determine the ph | |
18:21 | of a buffer solution conceptually by looking at the ratio | |
18:25 | between based acid or acid base . And remember if | |
18:33 | you have more of the asset , then the contract | |
18:37 | base . The ph is going to be less than | |
18:44 | the PK . And if you have equal amounts of | |
18:47 | acid and base , the ph will be equal to | |
18:51 | the PK whenever you have a buffer solution . Now | |
18:55 | , let's go ahead and work on some practice problems | |
18:58 | . Number one . What is the ph of a | |
19:01 | solution Consistent of .75 molar acetic acid And .5 Molar | |
19:06 | sodium acetate . And were given the acid association constant | |
19:11 | of a city acid Is 1.8 times 10 to the | |
19:14 | -5 . Feel free to pause the video if you | |
19:17 | want to work on this problem . So what we're | |
19:22 | gonna do is we're going to use the Henderson Hasselbach | |
19:25 | equation because we have a weak acid and we have | |
19:28 | the conjugal we base , which means we have a | |
19:30 | buffer solution . The ph is going to equal the | |
19:37 | Peca of the weak acid plus log of the base | |
19:43 | . The base . We can write as a minus | |
19:45 | . Or you can simply put B . For the | |
19:47 | base and then A . For the acid . Well | |
19:50 | , you can write a check if you want . | |
19:52 | I like to write be over a base over acid | |
19:56 | . Now the first thing we need to do is | |
19:58 | calculate the P . T . A . Of the | |
20:00 | weak acid and that's negative log of the K . | |
20:03 | A . So we have the K . Value Which | |
20:08 | is 1.8 times 10 To the -5 . So the | |
20:20 | P . K . of the city acid is 4.7447 | |
20:27 | . So now let's plug it into this formula so | |
20:29 | that we have the PKK . It's this number and | |
20:34 | then plus log the base . This is the based | |
20:39 | component of the buffer . So the concentration is .5 | |
20:43 | Mueller And the concentration of the weak acid component is | |
20:48 | .75 Mueller . The unit similarity will cancel because we're | |
20:53 | dealing with a ratio here . So let's go ahead | |
20:58 | and plug this in 4.7447 plus log .5 divided by | |
21:04 | .75 . This is you can run into 4.57 . | |
21:13 | So that's the answer for this problem . So that's | |
21:16 | how we can calculate the ph of a buffer solution | |
21:20 | . Now , there's one more thing I want to | |
21:21 | mention regarding this problem notice that we have for more | |
21:26 | of the acid than the base because we have more | |
21:31 | of the acid than the base . The ph is | |
21:35 | going to be less than the peak . A as | |
21:39 | we discussed earlier in this video Here , we can | |
21:41 | see the ph is 4.57 . The PKA is 4.74 | |
21:46 | . So the ph is less than the PKK because | |
21:49 | we have more of the acid component than the base | |
21:52 | component of the buffer . Number two , What is | |
21:56 | the ph of a solution containing .15 moles of ammonium | |
22:01 | chloride And 1.5 moles of Ammonia . And were given | |
22:05 | the KB , the based association constant of NH dream | |
22:13 | . So what should we do here ? What ? | |
22:16 | Once again we have a buffer solution , We have | |
22:18 | the weak acid and we have the weak base , | |
22:22 | the consequent weak base . Now in this case notice | |
22:25 | that we have more of the base than the acid | |
22:30 | . We have more of ammonia then the morning chloride | |
22:34 | . So what can we say about the P . | |
22:35 | H . And P K . The ph is going | |
22:40 | to be greater . And then the PKK because we | |
22:46 | have more of the base than the acid . Let's | |
22:48 | go ahead and calculate the P K . Were given | |
22:50 | the KB . So we need to calculate the PKB | |
22:52 | . 1st PKB is negative log of KB . So | |
23:02 | this is gonna be negative log of 1.8 Times 10 | |
23:07 | to the -5 . And we've seen that value . | |
23:17 | So this is 4.7 44 73 Now the PKK plus | |
23:28 | the PKB , These two , they add up to | |
23:30 | 14 . So to calculate the P . K . | |
23:34 | It's gonna be 14 minus the PKB . So 14 | |
23:41 | -4 0.7 4473 . That gives us a peek a | |
23:54 | value of 9.2 5 5 - seven . So since | |
24:05 | we have more bass than acid , we know that | |
24:08 | the answer the ph of the solution Has to be | |
24:11 | greater than the P . K . It has to | |
24:13 | be greater than 9.25 5-7 . Let's run that to | |
24:18 | nine 255 So let's go ahead and calculate the ph | |
24:24 | of the solution . But before we do that , | |
24:28 | notice that the ratio of base to acid is 10-1 | |
24:33 | , 1.5 divided by .15 is 10 . Whenever the | |
24:38 | ratio is 10 to 1 or 1 to 10 , | |
24:41 | we know that ph will differ From the PKK by | |
24:44 | one unit . And since we have more bass than | |
24:47 | acid , one unit higher than this number , It's | |
24:50 | gonna be 10.255 . Therefore conceptually , we know that | |
24:55 | the ph of this solution should be this value . | |
25:00 | And we're going to confirm it by calculation So we | |
25:02 | should get 10.255 . So let's write the buffer equation | |
25:08 | , ph is equal to P K plus log based | |
25:15 | over acid . The PKK is nine .255 And then | |
25:23 | we can add the 27 as well to get a | |
25:25 | more accurate result and then plus log Now , as | |
25:29 | was mentioned before , this could be in eunice similarity | |
25:33 | or it could be in moles . Both hands will | |
25:36 | cancel . So we're going to plug in the most | |
25:39 | . We have 1.5 moles over point 15 moles . | |
25:46 | So we can cross out these two units . Now | |
25:51 | let's plug this into our calculator , 9.255-7 plus log | |
25:59 | 1.5 over .15 . This will give you 10.2 5 | |
26:06 | 5 - seven . So that's the ph of the | |
26:10 | solution . So we could see why it's one unit | |
26:14 | higher Is because the ratio of based asset is 10-1 | |
26:19 | . Number three , Calculate the ph of a solution | |
26:23 | containing 15g of Hydrofluoric acid and 21 g of sodium | |
26:28 | fluoride In 750 ml of solution . So once again | |
26:32 | we have a buffer solution but this time well given | |
26:36 | the grams of the acid and a base before we | |
26:39 | had the polarity . And during the second problem we | |
26:41 | had the moles for this one . All we need | |
26:44 | to do is convert grams to moles . And then | |
26:47 | we could use the buffer equation . So let's do | |
26:49 | that first . So we have 15 g of HF | |
26:55 | . To convert it to moles . We need to | |
26:56 | know the molar mass . The molar mass of hydrogen | |
27:02 | is approximately one For flooring is 19 . So this | |
27:07 | is approximately 20 g per remote . So one mole | |
27:11 | of HF Has a mass of approximately 20 gramps . | |
27:19 | So we can cross out the unit grams of HF | |
27:23 | . It's gonna be 15 divided by 20 , Which | |
27:25 | is .75 . So that's how much moles of acid | |
27:30 | we have in this solution . Now let's start with | |
27:34 | 21 g of the base . Any f . Let's | |
27:37 | convert that to mel's sodium has an atomic mass of | |
27:44 | approximately 23 And for Florida's 19 23 Plus 19 is | |
27:49 | 42 . So one more . Love any F . | |
27:55 | Has a mass of approximately 42 g . 21 divided | |
28:04 | by 42 is .5 . So we get .5 moles | |
28:10 | of sodium fluoride . So now that we have the | |
28:13 | moles of the acid and base , we can now | |
28:17 | calculate the ph but first , let's calculate the P | |
28:21 | K . The PKK , which is negative log of | |
28:24 | K . A and K . Is that number ? | |
28:27 | So we have the negative log of 7.2 times 10 | |
28:31 | to the -4 . And so that's going to be | |
28:41 | 3.14 27 So now that we have that , let's | |
28:48 | use the Henderson Hasselbach equation to get the ph of | |
28:53 | the solution . So the peka is 3.14-7 plus log | |
29:03 | of the base . The bases , by the way | |
29:07 | , will the ph b greater than or less than | |
29:10 | a PK ? So notice that we have more of | |
29:14 | the acid than the base . So because we have | |
29:18 | more of the acid than the base , the ph | |
29:22 | is going to be less than a PK . So | |
29:26 | the ph should be less than 3.14 - seven . | |
29:32 | The solution is acidic . So now let's go ahead | |
29:38 | and continue with this equation . So the bases .5 | |
29:43 | moles . The acid is point 75 moles . So | |
29:56 | let's plug this in 3.14-7 plus log .5 over .75 | |
30:03 | . This is going to be approximately 2.97 , Which | |
30:07 | is less than 3.14 . So that's the ph of | |
30:11 | the solution . So any time you have more of | |
30:15 | the acid component than the basic component , the ph | |
30:17 | will be less than the P . K . Number | |
30:20 | four . What is the Peca of an unknown weak | |
30:23 | acid ? If the ph of the solution was measured | |
30:27 | to be 5.62 When H is .45 And a minuses | |
30:33 | .85 . So we want to calculate the P . | |
30:37 | K . A . If we know the ph and | |
30:39 | the concentration of the weak acid and the conjugal weak | |
30:42 | base . So let's start with the buffer equation , | |
30:46 | ph is equal to P . K . Plus log | |
30:53 | base over acid . Now , what we need to | |
30:56 | do is we need to isolate PK . So I'm | |
30:59 | going to take this term , move it to the | |
31:01 | other side . So it's positive on the right side | |
31:05 | . It's going to be negative on the left side | |
31:13 | . Now I'm going to switch the left side of | |
31:14 | the equation with the right side of the equation . | |
31:17 | So we could say that the PKK of the unknown | |
31:20 | weak acid is going to be the ph of the | |
31:23 | solution minus log of the base over the acid . | |
31:30 | So this is how we can calculate the peak a | |
31:33 | of an unknown weak acid . All we need to | |
31:35 | know is the ph of the solution and how much | |
31:38 | of the acid and base that we've dissolved in a | |
31:40 | solution . So the ph is 5.62 . The base | |
31:51 | is the concentration of a minus . So that's .85 | |
31:58 | . The acid is the concentration of H . J | |
32:02 | . So that's .45 . So this is going to | |
32:16 | be 5.34 . So this is the peak a of | |
32:21 | the unknown acid . Now , let's see if our | |
32:25 | answer makes sense . So whenever the base is greater | |
32:31 | in concentration on quantity , then the acid we know | |
32:35 | that the ph is going to be greater than the | |
32:37 | PKK . Is that the situation here , while the | |
32:42 | ph The ph is 5.62 , the PKK It's 5.34 | |
32:51 | . So we can clearly see that the ph is | |
32:52 | greater than the peka . So this answer makes sense | |
00:0-1 | . |
DESCRIPTION:
This chemistry video tutorial explains how to calculate the pH of a buffer solution using the henderson hasselbalch equation. It explains the concept, components, and function of a buffer solution. A buffer solution consist of a weak acid and its conjugate weak base counterpart. It's purpose is to maintain a relatively constant pH value. This video discusses the relationship between the pH and pKa values with the relative amounts of weak acid and weak base components in the buffer solution. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems.
OVERVIEW:
Buffer Solutions is a free educational video by The Organic Chemistry Tutor.
This page not only allows students and teachers view Buffer Solutions videos but also find engaging Sample Questions, Apps, Pins, Worksheets, Books related to the following topics.