1.8 - Finding the inverse of a rational function with a root as a denominator - coolmath - By Mr. McLogan's Math Channel
00:00 | So I have three different relationships here between X and | |
00:03 | Y , and I want to think about which of | |
00:05 | these , if any , are proportional relationships . And | |
00:08 | then I want a graph him to see if we | |
00:09 | can see anything visually . That makes them obviously proportional | |
00:13 | . And just as a reminder of proportional relationship is | |
00:16 | one where the ratio between the two variables and let's | |
00:18 | say we took the ratio between why and acts . | |
00:21 | You could also go the other way around the ratio | |
00:22 | between X and Y , but the ratio between Y | |
00:25 | X is always going to be some number , some | |
00:27 | constant number . Or you could rewrite it another way | |
00:30 | . If you were to multiply both sides of this | |
00:32 | equation , Times X , you could see it in | |
00:34 | a proportional relationship . Why is always going to be | |
00:37 | equal to some constant times X So with that out | |
00:41 | of the way , let's look at these three relationships | |
00:43 | . So this one over here , let me drew | |
00:45 | another column here . Another another column . This is | |
00:50 | Let me call this the Y over X column . | |
00:52 | I'm just gonna keep figuring out what this ratio is | |
00:54 | for each of these pairs . So for this first | |
00:58 | pair when ? When X is one . Why is | |
01:00 | one half ? So this ratio is one half over | |
01:02 | one ? Well , one half over one is just | |
01:04 | the same thing as one half when X is four | |
01:07 | , wise to this ratio is gonna be to over | |
01:09 | four , which is the same thing as one half | |
01:13 | when X is negative . Two . And why is | |
01:15 | negative one ? This ratio is negative , one over | |
01:17 | negative two , which is the same thing as one | |
01:20 | half . So for at least these three points that | |
01:23 | we sampled from this relationship , it looks like the | |
01:25 | ratio between why next is always one half . In | |
01:29 | this case , K would be one half we could | |
01:31 | write why over X is always equal to one half | |
01:35 | , or at least for these three points that we | |
01:37 | sampled will say . Well , maybe it's always the | |
01:38 | case for this relationship between X and y . Or | |
01:42 | if you want to write it another way , you | |
01:43 | could write that Why is equal to one half X | |
01:47 | Now let's graph this thing well , when X is | |
01:50 | one wise one half what excess four . Why is | |
01:55 | too what X is negative ? Two . Why is | |
01:58 | negative one ? I didn't put the market for negative | |
02:01 | one would be . But right about there . And | |
02:03 | so if we say these three points air sampled on | |
02:06 | the entire relationship in the entire relationship is why is | |
02:09 | equal to one half X well , the point , | |
02:11 | the line that represents , or the set of all | |
02:14 | points that would represent the possible X y pairs . | |
02:18 | It would be a line . It would be a | |
02:20 | line that goes through the origin because look , if | |
02:24 | x 01 half times zero is going to be equal | |
02:28 | to why And so let's think about some of the | |
02:31 | key characteristics one , it is a line . This | |
02:34 | is this is a line here . It is a | |
02:37 | linear relationship , and it also goes through the origin | |
02:41 | . And it makes sense that it goes through an | |
02:43 | origin because if in a proportional relationship , actually , | |
02:46 | when you look over here 0/0 , that's indeterminant form | |
02:49 | , and then that gets a little bit strange . | |
02:51 | But when you look at this right over here , | |
02:52 | well , if x zero and you multiplied by some | |
02:54 | constant , why is going to need to be zero | |
02:56 | is well , so for any proportional relationship . If | |
03:00 | you're including when X equals zero , then Why would | |
03:03 | need to be equal to zero as well . So | |
03:05 | if you were , if you were to plot its | |
03:06 | graph , it would be a line that goes through | |
03:09 | the origin . It would be a line that goes | |
03:13 | through the origin , and so this is a proportional | |
03:15 | relationship and its graph is represented by a line that | |
03:18 | goes through the origin . Let's look at this one | |
03:21 | over here , this one in blue . Let's think | |
03:23 | about whether it is proportional . We could do the | |
03:25 | same test by calculating the ratio between Y and X | |
03:29 | . Why and X So it's going to be C | |
03:33 | for this . First one's gonna be 3/1 , which | |
03:35 | is just three . That's gonna be five over to | |
03:39 | five over too . Well , 5/2 is not the | |
03:42 | same thing as three . So already we know that | |
03:45 | this is not proportional , not not proportional . This | |
03:51 | is not that we don't have to look . We | |
03:52 | don't even have to look at this third point right | |
03:54 | over here , where if we took the ratio between | |
03:57 | why and access negative one over negative one , which | |
03:59 | would just be one . Let's see , let's graph | |
04:01 | this just for fun is what it looks like when | |
04:03 | X is one wise three when x is one wise | |
04:07 | three . What access to wise five Access to why | |
04:12 | is five and when X is negative one . Why | |
04:17 | is negative one What X is negative one ? Why | |
04:21 | is negative one ? I forgot to put the hash | |
04:24 | mark right there was right around there . And so | |
04:26 | if we said Okay , let's just give the benefit | |
04:28 | of doubt that maybe this is a these air three | |
04:31 | points from a line because it looks like I can | |
04:33 | actually connect them with the line . Then the line | |
04:35 | would look something like this that the line would look | |
04:39 | something like the line would look something like this . | |
04:44 | So notice this is linear . This is , ah | |
04:47 | , line right over here , but it does not | |
04:50 | go through the origin . So if you're just looking | |
04:52 | at a relationship , visually , linear is good , | |
04:56 | but it needs to go through the origin as well | |
04:58 | for it to be a proportional relationship . And you | |
05:00 | see that right here ? This is a linear relationship | |
05:02 | , or at least thes . Three pairs could be | |
05:04 | sampled from a linear relationship , but that but it | |
05:07 | does . The graph does not go through the origin | |
05:10 | and we see here when we looked at the ratio | |
05:12 | that it was indeed not proportional . So this is | |
05:14 | not proportional . Now let's look at this one over | |
05:17 | here . Let's let's look , let's look at what | |
05:20 | we have here . So I'll look at the ratios | |
05:25 | y over X . So for this first pair , | |
05:28 | 1/1 , then we have four over too . Well | |
05:31 | , we immediately see that we are not proportional and | |
05:34 | then 9/3 . It would be three . So clearly | |
05:37 | this this is not a constant number here . We | |
05:39 | don't always have the same value here . So this | |
05:40 | is also not not proportional , not proportional . But | |
05:47 | let's graph it just for fun when X is one | |
05:50 | , Why is one when X is too ? Why | |
05:53 | is for this ? Looks actually looks like the graph | |
05:55 | of this looks like the graph of why is equal | |
05:58 | to X squared when X is three wise nine . | |
06:02 | At least these three points are consistent with it . | |
06:04 | So 123456789 So it's gonna look something . And so | |
06:12 | if this really is , if these points air sampled | |
06:14 | from y equals X squared , then when x zero | |
06:17 | , Why would be zero , so this one actually | |
06:19 | would go through the origin . But notice it's not | |
06:21 | a line . It's not a linear relationship . This | |
06:25 | right over here is the graph of y equals X | |
06:28 | squared . So this one also is not proportional . | |
06:31 | So once again , these three points could be sampled | |
06:34 | from y equals one half X . These three points | |
06:37 | these three points could be sampled from We'll see why | |
06:40 | is equal to , Let's See . It looks like | |
06:42 | a line when this looks like it could be . | |
06:45 | Why is equal to two X plus one ? So | |
06:49 | it's a linear relationship , but it does not go | |
06:51 | through the origin , so it's not proportional . And | |
06:54 | this these three points looks like it could be looked | |
06:56 | like they could be sampled from y equals X squared | |
06:58 | , which goes through the origin when x zero . | |
07:00 | Why is zero ? But it's not a linear relationship | |
07:04 | , but anyway , you look at it . If | |
07:06 | you look at it visually , has to be a | |
07:07 | line that goes through the origin . Or , if | |
07:09 | you look at a table of values , you just | |
07:10 | look at the ratios and the ratios always have to | |
07:13 | be the same value . And that was on Lee | |
07:15 | the case with this magenta one right over here |
DESCRIPTION:
In this video tutorial I will show you how to find the inverse of a function f(x). I do this by first writing the equation substituting y for f(x). I then solve the equation for x. The result is the inverse. The inverse can be written, substituting y back in for x, and x for y. I also show how to verify that a function is an inverse of another function. I am a math teacher that provides free online math tutoring by working through problems for the website www.freemathvideos.com These questions are usually to help students understand their math homework or to do well on their math test. The videos are made for students that want help with math and want to be shown a step by step process into solving the problems. In addition to solving the problems I also offer explanations into why I am doing each step. I offer free math videos so that my students can learn math online if they missed a day of school. However I also like to answer questions that are no
OVERVIEW:
1.8 - Finding the inverse of a rational function with a root as a denominator - coolmath is a free educational video by Mr. McLogan's Math Channel.It helps students in grades 9,10,11,12 practice the following standards HSF.BF.B.4.a.
This page not only allows students and teachers view 1.8 - Finding the inverse of a rational function with a root as a denominator - coolmath but also find engaging Sample Questions, Apps, Pins, Worksheets, Books related to the following topics.
1. HSF.BF.B.4.a : Solve an equation of the form f(x) = c for a simple function f that has an inverse and write an expression for the inverse.